Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our Roster -- Players We Feel Good About (Part 1 - Offense)**


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

From Person:

Is Brady Christensen bound to be an OG or do you see Matt Rhule giving him a shot at LT? I thought he showed some good things during the few games when he was lined at that position. Thanks. — Guillaume G.

Rhule and Fitterer both said nice things about Christensen and left open the possibility that last year’s third-round pick could be the left tackle of the future. But they also made sure to point out Christensen’s versatility, with Rhule saying he’s confident Christensen will start … somewhere. But given what we’ve heard from Rhule previously about Christensen’s arm length and the fact that this is a draft loaded with talent at the tackle position, I’d bet they draft a tackle high and slide Christensen inside to guard.

Every time I hear about BC I just get annoyed all over again. Year 3 and we're still looking for a left tackle. I don't see how we are different or better off from the last regime. The same baffling negligence remains.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Every time I hear about BC I just get annoyed all over again. Year 3 and we're still looking for a left tackle. I don't see how we are different or better off from the last regime. The same baffling negligence remains.

We should be drafting lineman in the first every other year in the draft until this poo gets sorted out

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Every time I hear about BC I just get annoyed all over again. Year 3 and we're still looking for a left tackle. I don't see how we are different or better off from the last regime. The same baffling negligence remains.

We could have Slater and still be looking for a LT. Rhule doesn't evaluate offensive line talent well. He's looking for the prototypical LT and while it may exist on paper, it doesn't in the real world. Choosing a LT in this draft should not be left up to Rhule. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offensively we have talent that with the right coaching could do well.  Darnold had is moments good and bad (more bad than good) but I don't know many QBs in this league that could stand up to the pressure he was under.   You spend 4 or 5 series in a row with 3 and out you tend to try and make things happen.  Coaching IMO will be the difference.

What we need is an NFL caliber OC and O-line coach.   That's your beginning.   We have skill players at RB and WR.  TE could use some help but I am high on Tremble.  Get me an O-line coach and an OC and those players we see as weak could be good.   IMO we should go all in on the best interior linemen in free agency.  I don't want these bargain players that might be good or might be bad.  Give me a free agent that has a solid resume. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

Pretty spot on.

What we have:

CMC, DJ, an ok pair of T’s.

What we don’t have:

QB, interior line, goal line back, TE, and CMC.

 

 

 

I think that Chuba can be an effective goal line back.  Admittedly he's not your prototypical power back, but he has some juice. I suspect that his play jumps with a higher quality line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think that Chuba can be an effective goal line back.  Admittedly he's not your prototypical power back, but he has some juice. I suspect that his play jumps with a higher quality line. 

Safe assumption on an improved line.

Chubba can do it.  I’d just rather have a bruiser type.  
One that when the 4th quarter comes, guys have to start making business decisions before they try to tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Safe assumption on an improved line.

Chubba can do it.  I’d just rather have a bruiser type.  
One that when the 4th quarter comes, guys have to start making business decisions before they try to tackle.

I will admit, I covet an AJ Dillon type. The Packers should get him involved early this weekend to counteract that 49ers run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...