Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock Draft Simulator Thread 2022


Jay Roosevelt
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

My ideal scenario is we can trade back a few spots, and pick up an early second.  Pick up Cross/Ickey/Neal in first and best available QB in 2 (probably Howell or Coral).  After seeing some of the mocks here it looks like others are seeing the same thing. 

 

Probably unlikely it works out that way but one can hope.

It feels like the prospective bang-for-buck for the QBs is highest on those two. I would rather have either in the second than anyone else anywhere in the first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.211c17b571ecf2fb12af72f1686f91e2.png

Get the LT!

See if Howell is Baker sans the baggage, would not be afraid to draft an additional QB in 2023

Best Edge rusher available, situational, but worth a flyer considering our history of 3rd round picks

Clark is a stash for next year.  He has borderline first round talent.

Ezeudu is guard depth or can challenge BC for LG.

Ferguson is a Dalton Shultz/Dawson Knox type.

Weatherford has the mesurables to become a LB if he struggles at SS.  Worst case, with his measurements and athletic ability he could be a core ST guy.

Williams was a great deal, not likely to be around that late in the draft.

Didn't even realize that I traded with Atlanta twice.  LIkely would never happen, but who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...