Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There should be no issue with Watson waiving his trade clause per ESPN.


NCTHFL0567
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, PandaMan said:

We’ve pretty much been his last choice all along.  No idea why now he might waive it for us, there are a lot of better teams that are interested 

Per report. He will waive it. So yeah. Better teams? Maybe. But not better for Houston's sake. Trading him to the AFC is a huge L for Houston. Pitt already said they were out. Tampa doesn't have the cap. Seattle doesn't have the players that Houston would covet. So yeah..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of this very moment, there are only 9 teams that can afford a Watson trade, one of those teams on this list is actively restructuring contracts daily.....  🤔

1    Indianapolis Colts  
2    Miami Dolphins   
3    Seattle Seahawks    
4    New York Jets  
5    Chicago Bears    
6    Jacksonville Jaguars    
7    Cincinnati Bengals    
8    Las Vegas Raiders    
9    Carolina Panthers

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

Sooo, 50 mill for Watson & Armstead? And this seems doable?

Yes. The team acquiring can restructure DW once the ink dries on the trade.

"A simple restructure would allow Watson’s 2022 cap hit to be as low as $9.53 million following a trade." (source: https://overthecap.com/the-cost-of-trading-for-deshaun-watson/)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

As of this very moment, there are only 9 teams that can afford a Watson trade, one of those teams on this list is actively restructuring contracts daily.....  🤔

1    Indianapolis Colts  
2    Miami Dolphins   
3    Seattle Seahawks    
4    New York Jets  
5    Chicago Bears    
6    Jacksonville Jaguars    
7    Cincinnati Bengals    
8    Las Vegas Raiders    
9    Carolina Panthers

It clearly is Seattle or us at this point.  Please let it be Seattle.  And technically Watson puts us over the cap so we can’t exactly afford him

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

Sooo, 50 mill for Watson & Armstead? And this seems doable?

Its plausible, because if we are trading players in return on this deal and not just draft picks, that creates space as well. No telling who it will be, and there isnt mant options that would give us a shitload of money back, but with one or two more restructures and traded player(s)... D Watson and Armstead could happen. It will take some fancy money moves by Samir

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Maybe I am confused but how does that help us in regards to the salary cap? 

Didnt mean to confuse you, I was just stating that the weighted portion of the contract is paid for. So we could extend his deal and spread the numbers out if we end up landing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Yes. The team acquiring can restructure DW once the ink dries on the trade.

"A simple restructure would allow Watson’s 2022 cap hit to be as low as $9.53 million following a trade." (source: https://overthecap.com/the-cost-of-trading-for-deshaun-watson/)

This doesnt give me the warm and fuzzies about the situation. 

 

For a team to acquire Watson this year they would need to have $35 million to acquire the contract. Right now the only teams who would be capable of doing that are the Colts, Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins, and Jaguars. Plenty of teams can get there including the Lions, Steelers, Raiders, Bucs, Eagles, and possibly the Panthers. A team can restructure Watson’s contract for cap relief after the fact but would need the room, unless Houston picked up some of the cost, to execute the trade.

 

As it stands right now Watson’s contract has salaries of $35 million in 2022, $37 million in 2023, and $32 million in 2024 and 2025. Those would also be the salary cap charges associated with a team who trades for him. A simple restructure would allow Watson’s 2022 cap hit to be as low as $9.53 million following a trade. Watson’s 2022 and 2023 salaries are more or less guaranteed already, but a guarantee shouldn’t be of any concern for a team making this type of trade commitment as the expectation is to have a relationship well beyond the term of this contract.

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

It clearly is Seattle or us at this point.  Please let it be Seattle.  And technically Watson puts us over the cap so we can’t exactly afford him

you have to consider the players we are giving to the texans in the trade too. According to that article, we are in financial shape to make this happen. We still have about 4-5 options on the roster to restructure as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Its plausible, because if we are trading players in return on this deal and not just draft picks, that creates space as well. No telling who it will be, and there isnt mant options that would give us a shitload of money back, but with one or two more restructures and traded player(s

For the prices being suggested, the Texans would hopefully be willing to take Darnold.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

you have to consider the players we are giving to the texans in the trade too. According to that article, we are in financial shape to make this happen. We still have about 4-5 options on the roster to restructure as well

Agreed, just in a “be a dick” kinda mood.  😉

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good read and stuff under it is not bad either. https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/panthers-cb-jaycee-horn-says-184519429.html
    • While I'd love to add him, it just doesn't make sense for where we are at in our re-build right now. The only teams who should be interested are those who have a very legitimate shot at winning the SB this season, as any team who makes the trade is going to be mortgaging their future to make the move. Teams who make these kinds of trades and then give them the massive contract, in the hopes that it will expedite their path to contention, ALWAYS ends up backfiring because they have to give up the 1st round picks that are then needed to help build out the rest of the roster after eating up such a significant chunk of the cap on the new contract. There is no way the Cowboys trade him for anything less than 2 future 1st rounders (and probably more), plus we'll have to make him the highest paid non QB in league history.  Not to mention that it would then have made the Scourton and/or Princely picks a bit of a waste, as those 2nd and 3rd round picks would have been better off used on a ILB or DB
    • Like his approach to pre season that's ro get them out there and play together for a few plays and right about the night before and morning before.  Maybe we can come out the gate on fire I can smell the smoke from here!!   Go Panthers
×
×
  • Create New...