Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defense Taking Shape**


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

Someone not mentioned a lot on the interior is Nixon. I’m interested to see how he progresses. He was raw when he got here but I’m curious if a full off-season will help.

As for the safety’s, I’d really like Chinn to get moved back to LB.

Chinn - Thompson - Luvu with Wilson as a rotational piece is pretty solid.

Assuming we have another safety on the way…

FS - Woods, Robinson

SS - ?, Chandler

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

I suspect we are gonna see an even worse run defense this season. The roster is very much shaping up that way.

Really??  I think our new DT and replacing Reddick with YGM should make it better?  Reddick and Burns on the field together made it tough to stop the run.  Chinn in the box would be better than Carter, but I could be wrong there....

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We are like "if we can't get Watson we are going to might it tough for him with our new defense."  Run the ball with CMC, Chuba, Foreman behind a better OL with a stronger defense keeping DW on the sidelines for the Saints/Falcons. 

I'm sure ATL will work some kind of magic to get better at WR, but for now double team Pitts and I think that pretty much covers their offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Really??  I think our new DT and replacing Reddick with YGM should make it better?  Reddick and Burns on the field together made it tough to stop the run.  Chinn in the box would be better than Carter, but I could be wrong there....

Damien Wilson will probably play alot of special teams, but I'm pretty sure he's specifically good in the run game, just a liability in coverage because he's like 6' 260lbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Really??  I think our new DT and replacing Reddick with YGM should make it better?  Reddick and Burns on the field together made it tough to stop the run.  Chinn in the box would be better than Carter, but I could be wrong there....

We have no idea if those choices will be made or not. Chinn may stay at safety, YGM may stay a rotational guy.

Just based on looking at the current roster, I suspect we will get worse on that side of that ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

We have no idea if those choices will be made or not. Chinn may stay at safety, YGM may stay a rotational guy.

Just based on looking at the current roster, I suspect we will get worse on that side of that ball.

Fair enough.  Yeah if we start Haynes over YGM that would be terrible for our run defense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The run defense is going to depend on Derrick Brown not being a pushover.

Brown was an excellent run defender in college but thus far he doesn’t look interested when he’s out on the field.

I’m also calling it now.. this will be Haynes’ coming out party. It took Reddick four years to put everything together. This will be Haynes’ fifth year but really his third year of playing more than just a few snaps.

A lot of of our defensive success rides on guys finally putting it together… Brown, YGM, Haynes, and Luvu (as a full time player). If those four guys step up along with what we know we’ll get from Chinn, Woods, Thompson, Ioannidis, Burns, and potentially Horn (if he comes back strong) then the defense could be strong.

Another good safety and bringing back Gilmore could make the unit really strong.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Fair enough.  Yeah if we start Haynes over YGM that would be terrible for our run defense...

I doubt Haynes starts over YGM. IMO he'll sub in on 3rd downs as a pass rusher. Luvu or Wilson will be on  the field too depending on the alignment and package . So YGM may be competing some for snaps with those guys.

Edited by Michael G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Fair enough.  Yeah if we start Haynes over YGM that would be terrible for our run defense...

I also don't know that the coaches would agree that we were bad at run defense. Remember these guys live in a bubble and don't really see what the rest of the world does. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I also don't know that the coaches would agree that we were bad at run defense. Remember these guys live in a bubble and don't really see what the rest of the world does. 

I'm hopeful that our new staff (with experience) will help show them the light.  I think Wilks and our OL coach are really going to help us get better.  The negative it these are mostly short term deals which means we are looking at Jimmy G or Pickett...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I'm hopeful that our new staff (with experience) will help show them the light.  I think Wilks and our OL coach are really going to help us get better.  The negative it these are mostly short term deals which means we are looking at Jimmy G or Pickett...

I think we will be okay at QB. Another top 5 pick next year is extremely likely so we should eventually get one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...