Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC trade?


Recommended Posts

Fitterer has said many times that he would listen to offers.  Now that the Watson deal is dead and we've signed D. Freeman and still have Hubbard.

It makes me wonder if Fitterer isn't trying to get some draft capital back.

Personally, I want CMC to stay but since he still have value we might try to move him.  Another shorten season and his value will be minimal. 

Thoughts?

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

His value is already minimal in a trade scenario and the cap hit isn't worth any draft capital we gained(likely a 2nd rounder, at best). 

If he gets injured again next season and misses significant time, then I would say trade him for whatever you can get(5th, 6th, etc).

You're probably right.  I think there might be a couple of teams that would bite on a 1st but not many.  At this point a early 2nd would be perfect. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You're probably right.  I think there might be a couple of teams that would bite on a 1st but not many.  At this point a early 2nd would be perfect. 

I don't think many teams would part with a 1st for him. Not many want a RB salary at $8-12 mil for that length of time(4 years). Then you have even fewer that value RB's at a 1st round grade. 

Early second is mostly dumpster fire teams, so I am not sure how many of them would need a RB or want a RB-centric offense. 

I don't think we are actively shopping him, though. I think we are just willing to listen to offers.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a McCaffrey trade at this point is more or less off the table. Would need to be an overpayment and who’s going to overpay for an oft-injured RB with his contract? Nobody. Better to hang onto him and either roll with him or at least try to rebuild his value. Would be much better to trade him next offseason if he stays healthy this year and performs.
 

But also if we’re gonna roll with a young unknown at QB we’re gonna want McC for Ds to focus on. That along with a great OL is our only hope for success if we have a rookie QB from this weaker draft.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If he gets injured again next season and misses significant time, then I would say trade him for whatever you can get(5th, 6th, etc).

This makes good sense.  I love CMC but there comes a time when you wear a person down.  Could we get a 2nd?  I'm not so sure but if we could I'd let him go.  As you stated, if he is injured again we probably will have to settle for a 5th or let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ThPantherFan said:

This makes good sense.  I love CMC but there comes a time when you wear a person down.  Could we get a 2nd?  I'm not so sure but if we could I'd let him go.  As you stated, if he is injured again we probably will have to settle for a 5th or let him go.

Unless we get a pretty decent haul in draft capital, there isn't a great reason to get rid of him in 2022. He is the best offensive weapon at RB in the NFL if he can stay healthy. So see if he stays healthy and if he can't, just cut your losses and take the lesson about signing RB's to massive deals. We did something stupid and we paid the price.

If not, and he is healthy for a whole year, then you once again have a core member of the franchise.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

They should play him as a Deebo/Curtis Samuel type them only use him as a RB in the playoffs. Treat him like an NBA big man, let them play power forward during the season then when the playoffs begin and you need to go small and use your best lineup, your great big finally plays the 5

He is a great pass receiving RB....as a RB. If you try to make him a utility player then he immediately becomes less of a threat to a defense. You take away his most valuable tool, which is that he is a great runner. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...