Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ Walker vs Malik Willis


Recommended Posts

Just now, micnificent28 said:

Ask yourself that after Brady retires... pocket passer have won the last few basically on the strength of him alone. He's the goat. But what's left is Lamar jackson.Jackson.. Hurbert, Mahomes.Mahomet.. Russell Willson, burrow, and every other I m not a sitting duck in the pocket.

When was the last time a pocket passer didnt win the super bowl?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Who really cares man... stop scouting the comp and look at the traits. You look for things that translate at the pro level. If people thought like you would Josh Allen have went where he did? And looked good enough to have trey Lance follow right behind him? These guys are coming from basically 2a ball but they have the traits that translate. Stuff you can't teach. You could also make the argument he didn't put up better numbers because his team sucked.

He took out Virginia Tech with a Liberty University team.  They always leave off that one.  That's a team Virginia Tech pays to play and put up 50 points on.  He has also addressed why he left Auburn.  He said he wasn't mature enough, wouldn't watch film and just expected the coach's to make him their guy.  Gus Malzon did not (went with the legacy Bo Nix) and he transferred and has grown up a lot since then/learned from that experience.  He is an intriguing prospect after actually doing some research on him.  Seems very mature for his age and eager to get better at his craft.  Still a bit of a question mark, but has a lot of potential. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

He took out Virginia Tech with a Liberty University team.  They always leave off that one.  That's a team Virginia Tech pays to play and put up 50 points on.  He has also addressed why he left Auburn.  He said he wasn't mature enough, wouldn't watch film and just expected the coach's to make him their guy.  Gus Malzon did not (went with the legacy Bo Nix) and he transferred and has grown up a lot since then/learned from that experience.  He is an intriguing prospect after actually doing some research on him.  Seems very mature for his age and eager to get better at his craft.  Still a bit of a question mark, but has a lot of potential. 

I'm  not saying he is the second coming of Jesus either. I have said if I had my Choice I go ickey/neal/ then Willis. In a year where qbs are not looking that great why look for the highest floor lowest ceiling type guy when the chance for not being that great is equal? If I'm at bat I'm going for the home run.. not another teddy Bridgewater is what I'm saying..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, micnificent28 said:

I'm  not saying he is the second coming of Jesus either. I have said if I had my Choice I go ickey/neal/ then Willis. In a year where qbs are not looking that great why look for the highest floor lowest ceiling type guy when the chance for not being that great is equal? If I'm at bat I'm going for the home run.. not another teddy Bridgewater is what I'm saying..

Oh I get it and you are not alone in thinking he might be the top guy in this group.  He is my favorite, but I think he needs to go somewhere like Pitt that can develop me properly.  We would rush him out and probably mess up his career because Matt Rhule...  I think Corral fits what we need/style of offense we are running the most this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Oh I get it and you are not alone in thinking he might be the top guy in this group.  He is my favorite, but I think he needs to go somewhere like Pitt that can develop me properly.  We would rush him out and probably mess up his career because Matt Rhule...  I think Corral fits what we need/style of offense we are running the most this year.  

Yeah, I'm not saying that Willis is a surefire bust but I think our situation would be a very bad one for him. Hell, I think it's a bad one for ANY rookie.

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

When was the last time a pocket passer didnt win the super bowl?

We had a thread locked down already from this. Last 9 Super Bowls

Rams- loaded roster, Stafford throws 2 INTs and they still win

Brady

Mahomes- who is very mobile and extends plays/runs for the first when needed

Brady

Eagles- Nick Foles is probably available if you want him

Brady

Broncos- yeah Manning outplayed Cam alright... pocket passer vs runner or elite defense crush our terrible OL

Brady

Seahawks- Does Russ count?  

So 9 Super Bowls ago if you don't count Mahomes and Brady makes up for half of them in between.  If you are living by the pocket passer being your best chance to win a Super Bowl let's go sign Nick Foles, because he won one recently as a pocket passer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We had a thread locked down already from this. Last 9 Super Bowls

Rams- loaded roster, Stafford throws 2 INTs and they still win

Brady

Mahomes- who is very mobile and extends plays/runs for the first when needed

Brady

Eagles- Nick Foles is probably available if you want him

Brady

Broncos- yeah Manning outplayed Cam alright... pocket passer vs runner or elite defense crush our terrible OL

Brady

Seahawks- Does Russ count?  

So 9 Super Bowls ago if you don't count Mahomes and Brady makes up for half of them in between.  If you are living by the pocket passer being your best chance to win a Super Bowl let's go sign Nick Foles, because he won one recently as a pocket passer.

 

Mahomes had a total of 40 rushing yards in his super bowl playoff run.  Mobile qbs are a fallacy in the playoffs.  There are shiny and neat in the regular season but when the rubber meets the road you have to have someone in the pocket making plays. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Mahomes had a total of 40 rushing yards in his super bowl playoff run.  Mobile qbs are a fallacy in the playoffs.  There are shiny and neat in the regular season but when the rubber meets the road you have to have someone in the pocket making plays. 

Mobile doesn't just equal rushing yardage. Guys like Mahomes, Allen, Wilson, Burrow, Rodgers, etc. do a lot of damage throwing on the move.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Mahomes had a total of 40 rushing yards in his super bowl playoff run.  Mobile qbs are a fallacy in the playoffs.  There are shiny and neat in the regular season but when the rubber meets the road you have to have someone in the pocket making plays. 

4 of the top 11 rushing QBs have rings. We had this debate and it turned out it was just Chuck trolling. Are you trying to be like Chuck? If you are, good job! If not let’s go sign Foles so we can win a ring! 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mobile doesn't just equal rushing yardage. Guys like Mahomes, Allen, Wilson, Burrow, Rodgers, etc. do a lot of damage throwing on the move.

 

The main damage is getting a new set of downs, the D homies hate that....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...