Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How dangerous is Willis as a runner? What makes him special?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

AND?

I've never heard of him.  Just because he has player analyst by his name doesn't mean much. 

Obviously not much of a source. 

I mean if you no a hard-core draft nut you might think so. But I love this aspect of the NFL. But you won't find many that say he isn't a first rounder at qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

One read qb sounds a lot like the guy we drafted in 2011. All the things they were saying about Cam then older guys like you are saying now. He's a running back move his position. He can't throw. But bottom line people have seen him throw well enough to say he's above everyone else in this class. That should tell you he's more than just some running back at qb. He has to be able to throw..everyone knows that. These teams aren't going to draft a qb first round that doesn't have the ability to throw.

That was a myth about Cam.  I remember the conversations this forum went back and forth over that statement.  It was obvious the they were wrong. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Same question then: Can we win with Sam Darnold?

He's certainly a fine athlete. Heck, during the first part of last season, he ran for more touchdowns than any other quarterback in the league.

He's showing that he's capable of throwing the ball far or throwing it hard as well as running for first downs or even touchdowns when needed.

Using the criteria you've set yourself, he should be a perfectly capable quarterback.

So can we win games with him?

And if the answer is no, what's the specific reason why?

Sam Darnold has four seasons of NFL tape showing very clearly that he does not have the ability to process on field to be a successful NFL quarterback.  You can argue any of these rookies may fail but they have yet to play a down whereas Sam is a bust plain as day.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold has four seasons of NFL tape showing very clearly that he does not have the ability to process on field to be a successful NFL quarterback.  You can argue any of these rookies may fail but they have yet to play a down whereas Sam is a bust plain as day.

Well I think we are about to find out whether it was the O-line or Sam.  Rhule is stuck with Sam and will most likely have to ride with him to the end.  Unless we trade down I don't see us taking a QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold has four seasons of NFL tape showing very clearly that he does not have the ability to process on field to be a successful NFL quarterback.  You can argue any of these rookies may fail but they have yet to play a down whereas Sam is a bust plain as day.

But he has good athleticism.

I'm being told that this is a vital characteristic and that it can make up for the other deficiencies.

Are you telling me that it can't?

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Same question then: Can we win with Sam Darnold?

He's certainly a fine athlete. Heck, during the first part of last season, he ran for more touchdowns than any other quarterback in the league.

He's shown that he's capable of throwing the ball far or throwing it hard as well as running for first downs or even touchdowns when needed.

Using the criteria you've set yourself, he should be a perfectly capable quarterback.

So can we win games with him?

And if the answer is no, what's the specific reason why?

Screenshot_20220411-180034_Chrome.thumb.jpg.a1e178eb3b9e83fb0272ead807898c29.jpg

this is the reason you shouldnt lump in Fran Tarkenton and roger staubach with Vick or even Willis. Darnold is not an elite athlete. He moves well and probably has sneaky speed if defenses aren't prepared for it but That athletic ability alone isn't enough to build a offense around or even devote a every down spy to. Didn't Jordan Davis a 330 pound defensive tackle just run a faster time than this guy?

Darnold on paper may not be as good a athlete as you assume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

But he has good athleticism.

I'm being told that this is a vital characteristic and that it can make up for the other deficiencies.

Are you telling me that it can't?

It can, I imagine Sam would be even worse if he weren't athletic.

That said, the point people are making is about potential and it's safe to say after four years in the league he should have shown what he can do with it and he has not for whatever reasons you want to point to, like Sam feeling like he's proven he's good enough to be a starter.

Edited by Call Me James
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I will say this before the draft.  If we choose Willis I will be 100% behind him and will not hope he fails to prove my point. 

Yes if we take him I'll be behind him until he proves he can't play.

Hopefully he's the next Brady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

If Sam Darnold isn't even faster than this guy I don't want him bring mentioned as a duel threat. Being able to run one in from 5 yards out doesn't mean your a duel threat.

Screenshot_20220411-180756_Chrome.jpg

Most of Cams runs in were from 1 yard out so......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

But he has good athleticism.

I'm being told that this is a vital characteristic and that it can make up for the other deficiencies.

Are you telling me that it can't?

It would be beneficial to acknowledge you have a blind spot in this particular discussion. Everyone has bias. Willis is one prospect that reveals it more for whatever reason. If Darnold can get chance after chance after chance after chance and even someone like Sam Bradford can fleece the NFL for 130 million dollars in career earnings I think we can at least wait until the kid sees an NFL field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Screenshot_20220411-180034_Chrome.thumb.jpg.a1e178eb3b9e83fb0272ead807898c29.jpg

this is the reason you shouldnt lump in Fran Tarkenton and roger staubach with Vick or even Willis. Darnold is not an elite athlete. He moves well and probably has sneaky speed if defenses aren't prepared for it but That athletic ability alone isn't enough to build a offense around or even devote a every down spy to. Didn't Jordan Davis a 330 pound defensive tackle just run a faster time than this guy?

Darnold on paper may not be as good a athlete as you assume.

My God you are super biased aren't you.

Vick isn't even in the same dimension as Staubach. 

It remains to be seen if Willis will be but you are taking about one of the greatest QBs of all time. 

Vick bwahahahhahahahahahaha LMFAO 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Most of Cams runs in were from 1 yard out so......

If you leave out the average of 600 yards rushing and the long 70 yard touchdowns he was capable of breaking. The threat of the big chuck play made you respect newtson athleticism every down. You were always looking for it. But that worked in darnolds favor  because hey nobody expected him to run.

That said are we comparing Darnolds Red zone rushing ability to Newtons? A guy who literally ran over guys and around them into the enzone vs I caught you not looking at me and snuck in?

Screenshot_20220411-181442_Chrome.jpg

Edited by micnificent28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...