Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alexander predicts we get Garoppolo or Mayfield

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think the NFL realizes he needs a big ego checking and they're giving him one. It won't shock me if the Browns end up having to outright cut him and he has to sign a low cap hit prove it deal.

 

 

 

Even cut he is going to want a multi year deal.   fug that.   And I don’t see the point of having him for one season.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Kick the tires of all else fails. I'm definitely not pushing for Mayfield.

 

 

I know you are not, I am just saying in general its fuging retarded to "kick the tires" on any poo vet.   Say we trade for him and he wins 8/9 games?  Then what?  We are in a poo draft spot and is he going to want a multi year deal with starters money.  None of this makes sense.   How the fug can these morons not see that and just roll with darnold one more year and clear the fuging deck and start completely fresh at the qb position?  Its so incredibly simple but it seems like rocket science to this crap organization. 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I know you are not, I am just saying in general its fuging retarded to "kick the tires" on any poo vet.   Say we trade for him and he wins 8/9 games?  Then what?  We are in a poo draft spot and is he going to want a multi year deal with starters money.  None of this makes sense.   How the fug cannot these morons not see that and just roll with darnold one more year and clear the fuging deck and start completely fresh at the qb position?  Its so incredibly simple but it seems like rocket science to this crap organization. 

Because they're desperately trying to save their jobs. Tepper created this mess by not firing Rhule after last season. The desperation we're getting ready to exhibit at the QB position is going to be entirely due to that idiotic decision.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Because they're desperately trying to save their jobs. Tepper created this mess by not firing Rhule after last season. The desperation we're getting ready to exhibit at the QB position is going to be entirely due to that idiotic decision.

 

If my dumbass can see through that you have to assume that a self made billionaire can smell through that bullshit.  Make rhule play with the qb he traded for and all season gave props to.  If he can win with darnold he deserves more time.  He shouldnt get the chance for 4 qbs in 3 seasons.  (5 if you count Walker)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

If they draft a qb, they definitely ain't bringing in any other vet. 

That is a forgone conclusion. I just am failing to see how that improves Rhule's current situation.  This offseason has turned quite interesting to watch unfold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...