Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Fowler: Panthers have done their due diligence on QB Jimmy Garoppolo


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Garoppolo is a very sexy man therefore I think we should acquire him 

The man is a real difference maker -- if signed he will lift this franchise up in a way...

..."hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mudshark in your mythology"...

..."here it goes, the circular motion, now rub"...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garoppolo is not my pick to be the starter for the Panthers, but he is not as bad as people make him out to be.

The 49ers were 31-14 with Jimmy G. If you were to remove Jimmy G's game winning drives, the 49ers would have been 22-23. That is a significant impact. If Mayfield were the QB over this period of time for the 49ers, I would project the 49ers to have a 28-16 record not go to SB 54, not beat the Rams to get into the playoffs, and not beat the Packers to get to the NFC Championship.

Garoppolo converts 42% of his teams possible losses into wins. In comparison, Mayfield comes in at 19%, Watson comes in at 28%, Stafford comes in at 30%, Brady comes in at 42%, and Mahomes comes in at 43%. This is a measure of how effective a QB is at winning a game when the defense can't carry the game and the offense/coaching has failed to execute going into the 4th quarter.

From a Panthers perspective, Cam Newton is 22%, Jake Delhomme was 38%, and Sam Darnold is 11%.

Without diving into the complete model I use to measure a QB, this is the statistical foundation of what defines a successful QB in the NFL.

I will say this Garoppolo > Newton > Mayfield > Darnold. I project 3 QBs from the draft to be as good or better than Garoppolo. I believe none of those 3 QBs will be taken in the 1st round.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Go look at his playoff stats and get back to me. He sucks. He's been on some damn good teams.

 

No Way Wtf GIF by Harlem

Come on man, they beat 2 division champions on the road and lost by a FG to the eventual SB Champion. He wasn’t Brady, but damn the man deserves a little credit.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, weyco2000 said:

Did he light up the box score? Absolutely not, but he wasn’t awful either. The 49ers offense isn’t anything to write home about and will struggle with Lance starting next year. 

I'm sorry, but did you watch the games? I think awful is a pretty fair description of his play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, weyco2000 said:

No Way Wtf GIF by Harlem

Come on man, they beat 2 division champions on the road and lost by a FG to the eventual SB Champion. He wasn’t Brady, but damn the man deserves a little credit.

They beat GB 13-10 with 11/19 passing for 131 yards 0 TDs and 1 INT...  They scored off a blocked punt and 2 FGs.  You think that was Jimmy G? The game before at Dallas 16/25 172 yards 0 TDs and 1 INT.  Debo and Mitchell were able to run it in for him plus 3 FGs.  Those look very similar to Darnold numbers on a much better roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

He lost the super bowl and lost the nfc this year with his dumb int

It's what he does. He panics and does dumb poo. That's why I honestly don't think he'd look much different than Sam Darnold if he was playing for us. Take him off of a great overall roster with a good offensive minded coach and he's probably going to look a whole lot like Sam Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's what he does. He panics and does dumb poo. That's why I honestly don't think he'd look much different than Sam Darnold if he was playing for us. Take him off of a great overall roster with a good offensive minded coach and he's probably going to look a whole lot like Sam Darnold.

I agree Jimmy G is a lateral move.  Mayfield is a step up to at least midlevel.  I'd prefer to trade down and draft one, but Mayfield for cheap at LT in the draft is a decent plan B... (assuming the eat a chunk of his salary and we give up very little)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...