Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers meet with Sam Howell


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I keep seeing you shoot down every conceivable option but I have yet to see you offer a solution.  Howell has produced for multiple seasons.  All you ABCers can suck one

I see I triggered you.

I could care less what university the players attended when they get to the NFL. I care about winning games as a Panther. Sam Howell will not be a player who is capable of winning games for us(nor will almost any of these 2022 class QB's).

The options that would have helped us have all opted to go elsewhere the past couple of offseasons.

You want solutions? Sure. Fire Matt Rhule and hire a staff that won't alienate quality fee agents and have a fuging clue how to evaluate QB talent.

There is your solution. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Shocker said:

BTW…if we are hoping to draft our QB next draft you are talking about losing nearly every game for CJ Stroud.  He will go #1 barring something crazy.  

Bryce Young is extremely lacking size and doesn’t have the arm either.  We don’t want Tyrion Lannister as our franchise QB

Honestly I hope they pick one of these guys in this year's draft and one in next year's draft as well.

In my dream scenario they would get a LT and a project qb for next season.  Then trade with another bottom dweller like ourselves for their 1st in 2023. They would trade a player for that pick and position themselves to go after another promising qb. They would continue to do that until a franchise qb emerged among them.

One can dream...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the larger point, there is not a rookie in this class that will save rhules job. Not Howell, not Willis and not Pickett.   I just don’t understand the mindset of picking any rookie in the first when there are overwhelming odds this puppy will be taken to the studs again next season.   Get the tackle and make rhule win with Sam.   
 

as for Howell he has talent but he also needs to clean a lot of poo up.    I just don’t envision anyone giving us fair value to move up in this draft.   We picked a shitty year to be shitty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

On the larger point, there is not a rookie in this class that will save rhules job. Not Howell, not Willis and not Pickett.   I just don’t understand the mindset of picking any rookie in the first when there are overwhelming odds this puppy will be taken to the studs again next season.   Get the tackle and make rhule win with Sam.   
 

Which is why Rhule should've been fired but he wasn't so here we are. Gotta keep on keeping on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Which is why Rhule should've been fired but he wasn't so here we are. Gotta keep on keeping on.

I mean I am all for rhule getting another season as I see the logic in it howover I sure as fug don’t understand the thought process if he is going to roll a rookie out there behind this poo oline.   
 

if rhule wanted to rebuild the line ad go all in with darnold and then actually win then I get teppers logic.  But just throwing more poo at the wall is insanity.   No qb in this draft is going to start and win games for this franchise in 2022.   Can anyone argue otherwise?

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

On the larger point, there is not a rookie in this class that will save rhules job. Not Howell, not Willis and not Pickett.   I just don’t understand the mindset of picking any rookie in the first when there are overwhelming odds this puppy will be taken to the studs again next season.   Get the tackle and make rhule win with Sam.   
 

as for Howell he has talent but he also needs to clean a lot of poo up.    I just don’t envision anyone giving us fair value to move up in this draft.   We picked a shitty year to be shitty

Well look at it this way, no matter who they draft this team needs talent.  If Rhule takes a QB it only adds depth at a much needed position.  If it's a tackle it adds depth at a much needed position.  Neither will ultimately save Rhule's job next season.  It's a win/win for the fans and the next regime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Well look at it this way, no matter who they draft this team needs talent.  If Rhule takes a QB it only adds depth at a much needed position.  If it's a tackle it adds depth at a much needed position.  Neither will ultimately save Rhule's job next season.  It's a win/win for the fans and the next regime. 

Drafting a qb the next regime doesn’t want is just wasting a first.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean I am all for rhule getting another season as I see the logic in it howover I sure as fug don’t understand the thought process if he is going to roll a rookie out there behind this poo oline.   
 

if rhule wanted to rebuild the line ad go all in with darnold and then actually win then I get teppers logic.  But just throwing more poo at the wall is insanity.   No qb in this draft is going to start and win games for this franchise in 2022.   Can anyone argue otherwise?

We're highly unlikely to win a lot of games either way but Rhule's best chance of getting a 4th year is probably with a promising rookie and a team that shows improvement through the course of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

We're highly unlikely to win a lot of games either way but Rhule's best chance of getting a 4th year is probably with a promising rookie and a team that shows improvement through the course of the season.

Nah.  Rhule is done rookie or not.   There is just nothing he can point do to justify keeping his job.   Unless he makes the playoffs with darnold.   
 

 

i just lol typing that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Flip them and you have a deal. 

 

See. that's the thing. I know Colbert has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG? I do know Brown has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG?

 

Which one can play LG?

 

All I know is, we don't have to take a T at 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

See. that's the thing. I know Colbert has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG? I do know Brown has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG?

 

Which one can play LG?

 

All I know is, we don't have to take a T at 6.

Brown played LG the most in college.  He's a massive beast of a man.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Nah.  Rhule is done rookie or not.   There is just nothing he can point do to justify keeping his job.   Unless he makes the playoffs with darnold.   
 

 

i just lol typing that. 

If that was true he'd already be fired. Tepper hasn't accepted that this dude is a clown. He's still a believer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...