Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers meet with Sam Howell


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I keep seeing you shoot down every conceivable option but I have yet to see you offer a solution.  Howell has produced for multiple seasons.  All you ABCers can suck one

I see I triggered you.

I could care less what university the players attended when they get to the NFL. I care about winning games as a Panther. Sam Howell will not be a player who is capable of winning games for us(nor will almost any of these 2022 class QB's).

The options that would have helped us have all opted to go elsewhere the past couple of offseasons.

You want solutions? Sure. Fire Matt Rhule and hire a staff that won't alienate quality fee agents and have a fuging clue how to evaluate QB talent.

There is your solution. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Shocker said:

BTW…if we are hoping to draft our QB next draft you are talking about losing nearly every game for CJ Stroud.  He will go #1 barring something crazy.  

Bryce Young is extremely lacking size and doesn’t have the arm either.  We don’t want Tyrion Lannister as our franchise QB

Honestly I hope they pick one of these guys in this year's draft and one in next year's draft as well.

In my dream scenario they would get a LT and a project qb for next season.  Then trade with another bottom dweller like ourselves for their 1st in 2023. They would trade a player for that pick and position themselves to go after another promising qb. They would continue to do that until a franchise qb emerged among them.

One can dream...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the larger point, there is not a rookie in this class that will save rhules job. Not Howell, not Willis and not Pickett.   I just don’t understand the mindset of picking any rookie in the first when there are overwhelming odds this puppy will be taken to the studs again next season.   Get the tackle and make rhule win with Sam.   
 

as for Howell he has talent but he also needs to clean a lot of poo up.    I just don’t envision anyone giving us fair value to move up in this draft.   We picked a shitty year to be shitty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

On the larger point, there is not a rookie in this class that will save rhules job. Not Howell, not Willis and not Pickett.   I just don’t understand the mindset of picking any rookie in the first when there are overwhelming odds this puppy will be taken to the studs again next season.   Get the tackle and make rhule win with Sam.   
 

Which is why Rhule should've been fired but he wasn't so here we are. Gotta keep on keeping on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Which is why Rhule should've been fired but he wasn't so here we are. Gotta keep on keeping on.

I mean I am all for rhule getting another season as I see the logic in it howover I sure as fug don’t understand the thought process if he is going to roll a rookie out there behind this poo oline.   
 

if rhule wanted to rebuild the line ad go all in with darnold and then actually win then I get teppers logic.  But just throwing more poo at the wall is insanity.   No qb in this draft is going to start and win games for this franchise in 2022.   Can anyone argue otherwise?

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

On the larger point, there is not a rookie in this class that will save rhules job. Not Howell, not Willis and not Pickett.   I just don’t understand the mindset of picking any rookie in the first when there are overwhelming odds this puppy will be taken to the studs again next season.   Get the tackle and make rhule win with Sam.   
 

as for Howell he has talent but he also needs to clean a lot of poo up.    I just don’t envision anyone giving us fair value to move up in this draft.   We picked a shitty year to be shitty

Well look at it this way, no matter who they draft this team needs talent.  If Rhule takes a QB it only adds depth at a much needed position.  If it's a tackle it adds depth at a much needed position.  Neither will ultimately save Rhule's job next season.  It's a win/win for the fans and the next regime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Well look at it this way, no matter who they draft this team needs talent.  If Rhule takes a QB it only adds depth at a much needed position.  If it's a tackle it adds depth at a much needed position.  Neither will ultimately save Rhule's job next season.  It's a win/win for the fans and the next regime. 

Drafting a qb the next regime doesn’t want is just wasting a first.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean I am all for rhule getting another season as I see the logic in it howover I sure as fug don’t understand the thought process if he is going to roll a rookie out there behind this poo oline.   
 

if rhule wanted to rebuild the line ad go all in with darnold and then actually win then I get teppers logic.  But just throwing more poo at the wall is insanity.   No qb in this draft is going to start and win games for this franchise in 2022.   Can anyone argue otherwise?

We're highly unlikely to win a lot of games either way but Rhule's best chance of getting a 4th year is probably with a promising rookie and a team that shows improvement through the course of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

We're highly unlikely to win a lot of games either way but Rhule's best chance of getting a 4th year is probably with a promising rookie and a team that shows improvement through the course of the season.

Nah.  Rhule is done rookie or not.   There is just nothing he can point do to justify keeping his job.   Unless he makes the playoffs with darnold.   
 

 

i just lol typing that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Flip them and you have a deal. 

 

See. that's the thing. I know Colbert has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG? I do know Brown has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG?

 

Which one can play LG?

 

All I know is, we don't have to take a T at 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

See. that's the thing. I know Colbert has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG? I do know Brown has played RG, but don't know if he can play LG?

 

Which one can play LG?

 

All I know is, we don't have to take a T at 6.

Brown played LG the most in college.  He's a massive beast of a man.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Nah.  Rhule is done rookie or not.   There is just nothing he can point do to justify keeping his job.   Unless he makes the playoffs with darnold.   
 

 

i just lol typing that. 

If that was true he'd already be fired. Tepper hasn't accepted that this dude is a clown. He's still a believer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...