Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malik WIllis


janderson20vt
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd put him more Tyrod Taylor category. I think he's significantly more talented than PJ but not nearly as talented as the folks who wanted him at #6 claim.

He's a developmental guy that you take a shot in the second round if you have 2 capable starters on and playoff team.

I think NO and Atlanta take one tomorrow but couldn't tell you who each would take.  I'm high and happy and don't gaf.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not directly comparing the two, I'm just saying that a QB that fit the exact criteria of a guy who shouldn't be a 1st or 2nd round pick was targeted in a big trade up at #3 overall just last year.

For the record, I honestly don't want Willis.

I see what you're looking at because of the experience and Lance missing a season.. But physically its 2 different players.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Perfect prototypes have P5 offers. He ended up at NDSU (and Willis at Liberty via Auburn) for a reason. One or both may pan out but they're both projects.

Yeah 1 project was worth a bag in assets and the 3rd pick in the draft and the other isn't..

But they are both projects...are you good now??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can confirm that Lloyd is interested in the UNC job and isn't using it as a crutch for a pay raise and that Arizona already has a contingency plan in place if he leaves. I'm beginning to think based on rumblings that's he already decided to leave and informed UNC and Arizona of this. "Both schools knowing explains the information coming out of Arizona." 
    • With the DBs, I see more role definition than positional these days, so tend to view value a bit differently there...Basically, there's better defined roles to focus on rather than what position is listed next to their profile. Those roles: 1-The Outside Corner Group - obviously the highest valued DB  2-The Safety/Slot group - Higher-end safeties that can play slot/NB( I.E. It's the modern guy people want-- Hamilton, Branch, Pitre, Emman, the list goes on)   3-The smaller Nickel-only group.  Most of the time undersized guys that can't play outside -- the good ones end up out their 70% of the time these days with how much teams use 5/6DB sets.   4-The safety-only group    Regarding group 2: If you have a guy that runs in 2SH next to TM but then in a dime package be pulled into the slot so you can play Ransom/Scott back there, that's good value.   They really just play either spot at any given moment dependent on the matchup.  They allow for defenses to better disguise and make QBs think sideways.   Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, & Haulcy all fall into this group for me this year.    
×
×
  • Create New...