Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

West coast offense on the East coast


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

I thought Darnold has a quick release and the ability to make those quick reads. Brady's offense required time, time we didn't have with the offensive line and CMC hurt.

Darnold does have a quick release, and he if the first read is open, he can operate like an NFL quarterback...it's when he has to think...that's when it all falls apart.

I see Sam likely starting the season, but wouldn't be surprised at all, if Corral is the starter 8 games in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jmac said:

Question for all the Football geeks out there. The west coast offense requires a quick release and quick decision making. Darnold has neither quality. Assuming he is the starter, they will play a more conventional offense.

If he shats the bed midway through the season and they put Corral in, how long will it take to switch to a west coast/hybrid offense? Do we have the personal on the offense to play that game? Will thay have to redo the playbook to accommodate the system?

Darnold can play, so long as CMC is out there, and we keep it simple.  Meaning, we run the ball, do a lot of quick hit passes, and play good defense.  Operate like NE did when Brady was young...you can win like that, but typically only if you have a very smart head coach who almost never makes mistakes.........

If CMC is out, and we are counting on Sam to score more than 21/23 points per game...we will be in trouble.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Darnold does have a quick release, and he if the first read is open, he can operate like an NFL quarterback...it's when he has to think...that's when it all falls apart.

I see Sam likely starting the season, but wouldn't be surprised at all, if Corral is the starter 8 games in.

yeah, i think they'll give sammy a chance (which they should just roll with whoever shows themselves to have command of the offense and steps up as a leader in TC and in preseason games), but sammy will probably get a few games to see if he can do better with an improved OL and OC calling the shots.

but i'm also hoping they have a really critical eye and keep sammy on a short leash. he shows the first sign of seeing ghosts or skittishness and we yank him out and put Corral in.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pakmeng said:

Maybe but what are you basing this off genuinev anslysis? Did you watch him play extensively? Or are you being a pessimist?

Being a back up at the pro level isn’t a bad thing. 
 

backup - corral > PJ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, trucpfan said:

Lol based off what? Or that’s just a feeling you have? Based off Chris Simms qb evaluation over the last four years he’s been very accurate with his assessments. It SEEMS like Corral has the tools to be a excellent starter will our coaching staff actually coach him up  to his potential is my question.

It’s my contribution to the thread. Sorry if you’re upset with it. It’s just my opinion on having watched the player. Didn’t mean to upset you or anyone else

if he’s a capable backup I think it’s a win for the org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

yeah, i think they'll give sammy a chance (which they should just roll with whoever shows themselves to have command of the offense and steps up as a leader in TC and in preseason games), but sammy will probably get a few games to see if he can do better with an improved OL and OC calling the shots.

but i'm also hoping they have a really critical eye and keep sammy on a short leash. he shows the first sign of seeing ghosts or skittishness and we yank him out and put Corral in.

I think you put Corral in as soon as he knows enough of the playbook to not be limited. We already know who Sam is, we need to know about Matt before next years draft. 

Hopefully Fitt plays on how fast Wilson started even though they had just signed Flynn. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Rubi said:

It’s my contribution to the thread. Sorry if you’re upset with it. It’s just my opinion on having watched the player. Didn’t mean to upset you or anyone else

if he’s a capable backup I think it’s a win for the org

Getting a capable backup at 94 would be considered a win. Getting a capable starter at 94 is a GD steal. I think that we very likely ended up with the latter,  based on Simms' and others' evaluations, but we shall see. I whole-heartedly admit that I have never watched an Ole Miss game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

McAdoo will, IMO, install his offense and expect Darnold to execute it.   If he can't than Corral should be given the opportunity to do it.   I do not see us using an offense just so Darnold can start.

The offense, as I understand it, is a run first offense and should take a lot of pressure off the QB.  If Darnold can execute it there really isn't a decision to make.  

Corral is the man. 

All valid...

Darnold's skill set actually fits a WCO scheme pretty well.

His performance? Well... 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

I think you put Corral in as soon as he knows enough of the playbook to not be limited. We already know who Sam is, we need to know about Matt before next years draft. 

Hopefully Fitt plays on how fast Wilson started even though they had just signed Flynn. 

some will ask, "are you saying that Corral is as good as Wilson? Is that why he should start as a rookie?" but Seattle didn't know how good Wilson was until they put him on the field. We aren't going to know what he can handle unless they give him something to handle. Put him in and see what we've got. Like you said...we already know how sammy is when the pressure is on. Everything has to be ideal for him to do well. Nothing stays ideal for long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

some will ask, "are you saying that Corral is as good as Wilson? Is that why he should start as a rookie?" but Seattle didn't know how good Wilson was until they put him on the field. We aren't going to know what he can handle unless they give him something to handle. Put him in and see what we've got. Like you said...we already know how sammy is when the pressure is on. Everything has to be ideal for him to do well. Nothing stays ideal for long.

Before someone asks that, I am not comparing their talent levels, just the situation. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, rayzor said:

some will ask, "are you saying that Corral is as good as Wilson? Is that why he should start as a rookie?" but Seattle didn't know how good Wilson was until they put him on the field. We aren't going to know what he can handle unless they give him something to handle. Put him in and see what we've got. Like you said...we already know how sammy is when the pressure is on. Everything has to be ideal for him to do well. Nothing stays ideal for long.

I kinda disagree with this small portion....

I think a lot of teams knew that Russ could play, and play at a high level..we just didn't have nearly as many GM's that were able to see it all.  Most still want the 6'4" guy...and all did back then, and couldn't get past it.

Dude played a TON in college, won a ton, was an A+ athlete, and was clean off the field...was just short.  Too short for many to look past it.

That said, I don't think that we got a Russell 2.0.  I think it's closer to Russell .75, and we need to coach him up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...