Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther Fanbase number 10

Green-Ghost

By Green-Ghost,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted

We (The Emory Marketing Analytics Center and Fanalytics Podcast) pay special attention to the NFL because it showcases important lessons about consumer passion (fandom), and we can illustrate the power of analytics for sports and marketing.

 

Guys, this is about marketability. Don't lose sight of that. This isn't a ranking of how hardcore the fanbases are.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Lol Bills ranked 27th? I’ve seen those fans almost kill themselves over finally reaching the playoffs, while we have more fans of the opposite team in the stadium than us. 2015 was absolutely magical but the stadium has been a shell of itself since.

dudley boyz series GIF

bills may have the best fans, 27th is a pure joke. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We (The Emory Marketing Analytics Center and Fanalytics Podcast) pay special attention to the NFL because it showcases important lessons about consumer passion (fandom), and we can illustrate the power of analytics for sports and marketing.

 

Guys, this is about marketability. Don't lose sight of that. This isn't a ranking of how hardcore the fanbases are.

More or less, but they're not exactly framing it that way.

"It’s a look at the strength of fandom as of the end of the 2022 season. Since fandom is created over many seasons or even generations, this is a look into the past. The QB analysis is a look into the future. QBs are the overwhelming key to winning in the NFL, and winning is what ultimately builds fandom."

Just a weird approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, KSpan said:

More or less, but they're not exactly framing it that way.

"It’s a look at the strength of fandom as of the end of the 2022 season. Since fandom is created over many seasons or even generations, this is a look into the past. The QB analysis is a look into the future. QBs are the overwhelming key to winning in the NFL, and winning is what ultimately builds fandom."

Just a weird approach.

You have to read through all their nonsense. It's basically about marketability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You have to read through all their nonsense. It's basically about marketability.

I'm not disagreeing with you here. It would have been easier, but less clickbaity, if they just came out and said that instead of trying to convolute their way to equating some weird analysis of spend/prices and social media presence to somehow prove that a team has a better 'fandom' because of it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I'm not disagreeing with you here. It would have been easier, but less clickbaity, if they just came out and said that instead of trying to convolute their way to equating some weird analysis of spend/prices and social media presence to somehow prove that a team has a better 'fandom' because of it.

Yeah, the intro stuff is very cringey.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, KSpan said:

Yeah, anything purporting to rank fan loyalty with Carolina ranked higher over KC and Buffalo, let alone any of the other teams, is just silly. Given their methodology, Carolina's ranking is probably propped up by them having PSL's for longer than anyone else (guaranteed revenue, people paying higher prices) and having Cam and Luke for the past decade.

That's more likely than not. I'll take that. A W is a W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Joe Person mock draft. Mar 5.

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I love this draft because they picked the right OL.  It is possible that we have 2 rookies starting on the OL.  I would take Utah's Lomu as well, but for those who think you find the OL in free agency and not the draft, here is all I have to say:  We cannot give $110m to the 5 starting OL.  We need an infusion of youth on the OL as well.  If Ickey returns and can play, I imagine that he takes over for Hunt at RG--in 2027 or so.  Currently, our 2 guards and right tackle make up over 20% of the total cap.  We have to add 2 starters, but if Cade Mays was too pricey at around (anticipated) $8m, then we plan to draft a C, it seems. I think we draft an OT and C now because we will need a G or 2 and a RT soon.  While they were good in 2026, they were not elite.  For that kind of $$, we need elite.  Is starting a rookie LT and C ideal?  Nope.  But if we can get better than Nijman and Mays, we should be OK. I think we will pick up an ILB in free agency and add an ILB.  Who we draft (Mike or Will) will depend on who we sign.  Rodriguez is a favorite of mine, but if Golday is there, Morgan is going to take him.  Morgan will love him. I do not think we need to overpopulate the edge position right now because we have 1 edge returning from injury (Jones II), one rookie from last year ready to step up and could be really good (Scourton), and another who could be ready to step into the situational pass rusher role (Princely).  2 hold the edge very well and if we had a situational pass rusher to join Princely, we could be much better. I think rookies at Edge tend to jump considerably from their rookie seasons to years 2 and 3.  (Charles Johnson, Mike Rucker, and Greg Hardy were that way-and all became very good in time. Safety seems omitted, but we shall see.  That could be another free agent acquisition.
    • toldozer
      Casual Sports Betting

      By toldozer · Posted

      Soccer play today 
    • toldozer
      Charlotte Hornets Offseason Moves

      By toldozer · Posted

      Id like Evans from Duke in the draft as a shooter for the second unit. And probably a more athletic big to replace all, he's good but doesn't really fit the style. White, Evans, green, Williams and center tbd is a pretty good second unit 
×
×
  • Create New...