Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This right here is HUGE


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Zod said:

We lost so many games in the third quarter 

 

3rd Quarter Passing, Career: 

Baker Mayfield: 
67.7%, 16 TD, 5 INT

Sam Darnold: 
57.7%, 11 TD, 17 INT

 

Thanks to @ellis for the stats 

 

 

 

 

You know what's huge?

Mayfields rating of 17 when trailing in the 4th quarter. 

The opposite of clutch.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

::sigh::

 

but it was a cheap trade or something

You do realize that “above average” is a huge jump from Darnold? So yeah a $5 million dollar trade to go from worst in the NFL to above average at the most important position is a good trade. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

You do realize that “above average” is a huge jump from Darnold? So yeah a $5 million dollar trade to go from worst in the NFL to above average at the most important position is a good trade. 

Who gives a phuck about winning 8 or 10 games?

He's not a top 10 QB. It's a wasted move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

You do realize that “above average” is a huge jump from Darnold? So yeah a $5 million dollar trade to go from worst in the NFL to above average at the most important position is a good trade. 

Why do people keep comparing him to Darnold? Please stop. The people who didn’t want to trade for Baker don’t think Darnold is better. NOBODY, thinks that. Congrats, Baker is better than the worst starting QB in the league last year. 
 

Most people like myself just don’t want to settle for mediocrity and don’t believe Baker is an elite QB. You need that elite QB to win the Super Bowl in today’s NFL. Just because Sam sucks doesn’t mean we should’ve traded for Baker. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

Who gives a phuck about winning 8 or 10 games?

He's not a top 10 QB. It's a wasted move. 

What a terrible take. You don’t need a top 10 QB to win it all. See Nick Foles, Joe Flacco, Manning his final year, Eli Manning. What you can’t have is QB that is the very bottom of the league. We have had a top 10 QB once in our entire history and he wasn’t top 10 consistently. Delhomme got us to just as many Super Bowls as Cam did without being top 10.

We had a good chance to upgrade the position and make our team better for very cheap and made it happen. Smart teams do that and now we can build a competent offense to insert our next QB if Baker isn’t our guy. Better yet top FA QBs May actually consider Charlotte as a destination instead of bottom of the league team/offense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SazmoRanger said:

Why do people keep comparing him to Darnold? Please stop. The people who didn’t want to trade for Baker don’t think Darnold is better. NOBODY, thinks that. Congrats, Baker is better than the worst starting QB in the league last year. 
 

Most people like myself just don’t want to settle for mediocrity and don’t believe Baker is an elite QB. You need that elite QB to win the Super Bowl in today’s NFL. Just because Sam sucks doesn’t mean we should’ve traded for Baker. 

We had Sam, PJ, and a 3rd round rookie who said himself he isn’t ready yet. So what would you option be aside from tanking this year and trying to get lucky in the next draft? 
Sam sucking and being our top option absolutely means we should have traded for Baker. Our staff’s job is to try to win as many games as possible and this trade helps them achieve that while Corral gets his feet wet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

We had Sam, PJ, and a 3rd round rookie who said himself he isn’t ready yet. So what would you option be aside from tanking this year and trying to get lucky in the next draft? 
Sam sucking and being our top option absolutely means we should have traded for Baker. Our staff’s job is to try to win as many games as possible and this trade helps them achieve that while Corral gets his feet wet. 

Well I’d try and do the same thing the Chiefs, Chargers, Raiders, Packers, Bills, Ravens, Texans(DW4), Bengals, and the Cardinals did. The formula is out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What a terrible take. You don’t need a top 10 QB to win it all. See Nick Foles, Joe Flacco, Manning his final year, Eli Manning. What you can’t have is QB that is the very bottom of the league. We have had a top 10 QB once in our entire history and he wasn’t top 10 consistently. Delhomme got us to just as many Super Bowls as Cam did without being top 10.

We had a good chance to upgrade the position and make our team better for very cheap and made it happen. Smart teams do that and now we can build a competent offense to insert our next QB if Baker isn’t our guy. Better yet top FA QBs May actually consider Charlotte as a destination instead of bottom of the league team/offense.

In fairness, Peyton Manning was easily the worst QB in the NFL when he won his 2nd title. That isn't hyperbole.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the recent Super Bowl winners Rams, Bucs, Eagles, Chiefs, Broncos all established solid teams before acquiring their Super Bowl winning QBs. The Chiefs drafted theirs, but traded up to get him as they were already a playoff team with an average QB in Smith. Bucs and Rams had average to below average QB play and build solid teams around them before trading for or signing their guy. Eagles won as a team with a journeyman QB filling in for their drafted one. 
Even if he doesn’t win a Super Bowl, have a decent QB to run our offense and build up our team is a big next step from constantly drafting in the top 10. We become more attractive for vet QBs that may want to leave their team for whatever reason or we can trade up and get our rookie to insert in an offense that isn’t limp and dead. Corral could even be that guy. Rolling it back with Sam and PJ is just hoping for the draft to save us.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SazmoRanger said:

Well I’d try and do the same thing the Chiefs, Chargers, Raiders, Packers, Bills, Ravens, Texans(DW4), Bengals, and the Cardinals did. The formula is out there. 

The Chiefs are the only recent Super Bowl winners out of those teams unless you are including Flacco’s Ravens win. The Chiefs had an average QB in Smith who could get them in the playoffs but not much further BEFORE they traded up to acquire a QB in which they let him sit fit a while behind Smith. So we very well could be attempting their formula (only they have Reid and we have Rhule… yuck). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...