Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield and Scott Fitterer presser today at noon.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Tepper involved ?

Thought I heard that. On the one hand it's not a good thing for owners to get involved at that level, on the other no one trusts Rhules personnel decisions after last year so maybe that's a situation where Tepper will side with Fitt and McAdoo if Rhule is being stubborn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest Revelations

Mayfield will wear #6, which means Johnny Hekker will wear #4 or #13...or #1 😐

Baker has relatives in both Spartanburg and Charlotte, so he's heard about the heat.

He hasn't eaten at Bojangles yet.

And lastly, no Progressive commercials in BOA. Baker pitched the idea but it was rejected (damn it) 😠

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, rayzor said:

so are they saying anything? 

can't watch.

 

The thing that I zeroed in on was Baker apparently believing (or knowing) that he will have more "freedom" at the line to audible and counterpunch based upon what the opposition is trying to do. 

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

The owner should never be involved in those kinds of decisions.

I doubt he will be.

Fitterer's comment just sounded like kind of an offhand thing to me, i.e Tepper will be around for stuff but I seriously don't he'll have any involvement in depth chart or playing decisions.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

The thing that I zeroed in on was Baker apparently believing (or knowing) that he will have more "freedom" at the line to audible and counterpunch based upon what the opposition is trying to do. 

He was allowed to do this in college, from what I hear stefanski wanted the offense ran how he wanted and didnt give him a lot of freedom to audible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are gonna be looking for a "gotcha" moment but there really wasn't one.

The only thing I heard that people could potentially pick up on was a dismissive comment where he said something like he doesn't really care about people's negative opinions.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

People are gonna be looking for a "gotcha" moment but there really wasn't one.

The only thing I heard that people could potentially pick up on was a dismissive comment where he said something like he doesn't really care about people's negative opinions.

Should he?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I doubt he will be.

Fitterer's comment just sounded like kind of an offhand thing to me, i.e Tepper will be around for stuff but I seriously don't he'll have any involvement in depth chart or playing decisions.

Maybe, maybe not. Tepper is giving me more and more wannabe Jerry Jones vibes.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dynomite said:

Should he?

Not really.

But ya know how it goes...

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I suspect that he has a serious problem with criticism though based upon his responses about only caring what people in the building think.

Isn't that kinda how Newton was too, though?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Biggest Revelations

Mayfield will wear #6, which means Johnny Hekker will wear #4 or #13...or #1 😐

Baker has relatives in both Spartanburg and Charlotte, so he's heard about the heat.

He hasn't eaten at Bojangles yet.

And lastly, no Progressive commercials in BOA. Baker pitched the idea but it was rejected (damn it) 😠

I would add that he mentioned he already knows Campen's O-line terminology/protections so that's half the battle really. Now it's just translating the playbook. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...