Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

You can get away with saying dumb things if you're a winning coach.

Heck, if you're just getting started, you might even get away with losing some games if you actually say the right things.

But if you're losing and on top of that you say really stupid things?

Oy 😬

Hopefully Tepper will rule as not an NFL coach and fire him before the season starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Typical huddle constructing it's own bullshit reality and then getting upset about it. 

To you people in the local and national sports media the pro sources who have years of experience in the league and all the fans who are critical are just blinded by their dislike of Matt Rhule. It's all a conspiracy to make him look bad right?

Season 5 Reaction GIF by The Office

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

hyberbole much?  And rhule just fuging said by getting more reps it helps you get better Jesus dude

He did but he also said that whatever you get you need to maximize what you do. That doesn't mean he was criticizing him because he has no delusion that Corral could start right now. Simply said what he would say about anyone. You know, 1% better every day. Maximize your opportunities. Typical coach speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Your HC just said that players only get better with more reps… pick a side my guy.

He also isn't focused on getting Corral  ready to start. Baker and Darnold are getting reps. What part of that is so hard to figure out. And McAdoo is making the decisions not Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

Maybe, just maybe, Rhule & staff believes that from what they've seen from Corral, he isnt ready for more reps just yet. So they gave him limited live game play that wouldn't break his confidence but gain experience during his development...

Given the way Rhule looks at other spots like Baker\Sam, our C situation, Brady going from not having the tools to play LT to keeping our top 10 LT out of the spot to date….I’d say it is a tough sell.  

Think the most obvious take is Rhule has a pointless mess in front of Corral and Corral suffers from that.  You got dudes like 89 saying it’s clear watching that Corral is a stud that needs reps/time to develop. 

Rhule has fantasy competitions that aren’t real.   That’s the story.  Corral is part of trickle down effect.  There are others.   Like Baker and Bozeman not working together all off-season and figuring it out in season pointlessly, etc.  But we got college Rhule out there screwing around not able to figure out the clear cut best players. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

He also isn't focused on getting Corral  ready to start. Baker and Darnold are getting reps. What part of that is so hard to figure out. And McAdoo is making the decisions not Rhule.

Why are other teams doing it completely differently then?

 

how many other teams played 4 qbs yesterday?

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

its pointless to argue with guys still in rhules camp at this juncture, their argument lacks complete commonsense

If Corral starts this year then we are going to be in the running for a top 3 pick.  Care to take a guess what position they would probably draft in that scenario? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Why are other teams doing it completely differently then?

 

how many other teams played 4 qbs yesterday?

You should know that every team does what they think is best for them. And that every year is completely different with different players and staff.  Feel free to ask the old guy or email Rhule to see the rationale. My point in this thread has been simply to point out what seems obvious to me that others seemed so confused about. You can argue you hate the plan but clearly there is one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...