Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foreman is our 2


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

800 yards rushing less than 200 receiving kick returns are pretty much a guarenteed 20 yards....

 

Dude averaged a whopping 3.5 YPC in 2004..... and half of the TDs were in one game get real chuck.

.

5 100 yard games and 4 straight 100 rushing game.  Pretty good stuff 

Edited by Panthers Fan 69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you base anything around CMC receiving whatsoever you have to put Foreman at #2. His past catch rate % is between 80-100 every year. Chuba looks quick with straight line speed but is vaporized when he hits the D-line wall. All his college highlights were running through a wide open gap straight ahead for whatever yards who cares

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I'm an elephant I'll never forget him knocking Jake's passes up vs the Hawks and causing the first two INTs.

You are talking about the NFC championship game against the Seahawks in 2005-06 season. I’m talking about goings from 2004 season when Moose had his best year as a panthers and everyone including Smitty Davis and Foster went down. We started 1-7 and clawed back to 7-9  Kasey had to kick a 60 yard field goal against the saints to go to playoffs  and it was blocked. Goings Jake and Moose were the only offense we had that 2nd half of the year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

30 carries a game will do that lol he is the definition on the law of diminishing returns.

That was more because Fox went to three yards and a cloud of dust offense over the second half of the season.  With Steve Smith and Deshaun out for the year, and Stephen Davis done, didn't have much of a choice.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...