Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayfield comment on the Browns game


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

That would be him saying it.

Uhh, no. 

Once again, she literally said it wasn't about the Browns.  So how could Baker say he was going to fnck up the Browns?

Second she said SHE said it.

You're going to believe whatever you want Mr Scott.  She says its being misreported and she shouldn't have reported it.  SHE is saying this.  I guess for you, if she doesn't tweet it, it isn't true. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That would be him saying it.

Likewise, if he actually didn't say those particular words, she would state that quite clearly.

I interpret this differently.  I interpret the exchange as:

REPORTER:  "Go F* them up Baker"  (colorful well wishes for start of season)

BAKER:  "I will"  (thanks)

That's probably all it was, based on what I've seen.  Then, someone decided then needed more followers or whatever and made more of it.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That would be him saying it.

Likewise, if he actually didn't say those particular words, she would state that quite clearly.

Once, again, your post title says Browns game.

SHE SAYS NO ONE SAID THAT.  NOT HER OR BAKER.

Your title is patently false.

Edited by poundaway
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Uhh, no. 

Once again, she literally said it wasn't about the Browns.  So how could Baker say he was going to fnck up the Browns?

Second she said SHE said it.

You're going to believe whatever you want Mr Scott.  She says its being misreported and she shouldn't have reported it.  SHE is saying this.  I guess for you, if she doesn't tweet it, it isn't true. 

 

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

Once, again, your post title says Browns game.

SHE SAYS NO ONE SAID THAT.  NOT HER OR BAKER.

Your title is patently false.

Yeah sorry, she's not saying that. I get that's what you want her to be saying, but it isn't.

And she did tweet, specifically a statement with no denial of what he said, same as everything else she's spoken.

If it weren't true, it'd be very easy to say so. She isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

 

Yeah sorry, she's not saying that. I get that's what you want her to be saying, but it isn't.

And she did tweet, specifically a statement with no denial of what he said, same as everything else she's spoken.

If it weren't true, it'd be very easy to say so. She isn't.

 

She is saying so. 

When the transcript of the video is out.  I'm posting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I interpret this differently.  I interpret the exchange as:

REPORTER:  "Go F* them up Baker"  (colorful well wishes for start of season)

BAKER:  "I will"  (thanks)

That's probably all it was, based on what I've seen.  Then, someone decided then needed more followers or whatever and made more of it.

Could be, but I get the impression that while she didn't focus her statement on the Brown, he very well might have.

Right now she seems to be trying to cover both her own ass and Baker's (especially after getting calls from both the Panthers and Browns) but for me it's a big "So what? Guys say stuff like that all the time."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I interpret this differently.  I interpret the exchange as:

REPORTER:  "Go F* them up Baker"  (colorful well wishes for start of season)

BAKER:  "I will"  (thanks)

That's probably all it was, based on what I've seen.  Then, someone decided then needed more followers or whatever and made more of it.

Yup.  That is how she describes it.  But she didn't tweet it, so it can't be true.

Twitter=truth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Is this for real??? Who cares if he said he will fug them up or agreed with someone saying it??  I hope he said it and I hope he does it!  It's definitely not out of his personality to say it and I'm sure he will do everything in his power to back it up.

Pretty much...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...