Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official 2023 QB Watch


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

Interesting week so far in Mobile.  Some expectations have been adjusted and it sounds like the lower tiers of QBs are not impressing. 

My Updated Rankings:

1. Bryce Young (Top-5)

2. CJ Stroud (Top-10)

3. Will Levis (Top-10)

--tier drop--

4. Anthony Richardson (Mid R1-2) 

5. Tanner McKee (Late R1-2)

--tier drop--

6. Hendon Hooker (R2-3)

7. Jake Haener (R3-5)

8. Max Duggan (R4-6)

9. Jaren Hall (R4-6)

--tier drop--

10 & Beyond:

Tune, O'Connell, Thompson-Rob, Bagent (7th-UDFA)

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Their layout is always great, one of the best designed websites for this type of thing. 

Not for QBs/or Panther related-- but I am beginning to agree with the S-N & Addison both over Johnston at WR.   Seen that popping up on more than a few places recently.  In deep diving, seems many aren't the biggest fans of Quentin's catching style and route running.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daniel Jeremiah on his latest podcast.


“If you like one of these QBs, you have to take them.  There’s no assurances you’ll have a top 2 pick next year. And if you get 3.  1 and 2 aren’t going to trade off those guys.”

“You can’t afford to play the waiting game”

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Makes sense. I always thought he was likely a 3rd rounder with a chance to maybe sneak into the late 2nd. Factor in the injury and yeah, 4th round sounds about right.

Kind of makes me think if he do draft Richardson at 9, Hooker with our 4th could work as a complimentary backup for him. The offense wouldn’t have to change much. We are probably much better off with a vet, but it’s a thought…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Makes sense. I always thought he was likely a 3rd rounder with a chance to maybe sneak into the late 2nd. Factor in the injury and yeah, 4th round sounds about right.

That’s just the grades they have on them too.  
im sure he won’t fall out of the 3rd, heck even early 3rd with how thirsty the league is for QBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ncfan said:

That’s just the grades they have on them too.  
im sure he won’t fall out of the 3rd, heck even early 3rd with how thirsty the league is for QBs

I doubt he goes in early 3rd. He's gonna miss the whole off-season and preseason. His rookie year is basically gonna be a redshirt year and then you find out how well he bounces back from the injury.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Given the draft makeup after the top-10 or so, I feel many teams are going to be hoping for trade downs. Which makes downward movement a bit more tricky.  So they may just go for the best impact they see fit and surprise.  I mean, can use someone at all levels of our defense (ILB, DE, S and Slot). Offense need more OL bodies and could use another WR. No way we can be zeroed in on a particular position.  Makes me damn curious to our board and how they’re weighing immediate vs long term impact.  I still see multiple guys rather than positions in play. S: Thieneman, McNeil-Warren ILB: Rodriguez, Allen DL: Faulk, McDonald WR/TE: Saddiq, Cooper, Boston, Conception OL: Freeling, Proctor, Lomu, Iheanachor Heck, even the EDGE group in our range is interesting like Parker. - Then there’s these guys that are in that 19/51 fringe range that seem to be really good fits-Haulcy, J Rod, Golday, etc.
    • I guess I could see it if we got breaks, but we got the breaks this year and it was still 8 wins.   Also I dont see TB crumbling, they are a competent franchise that hit the injury bug last year I dont know what to think about NO so theres that. Atlanta majorly upgraded at coach so there is always something to having a competent grown up leading a team.  
    • Glad he's coming back but honestly surprised. I guess the new staff convinced him there was going to be PT for him. It was baffling how Hubert never played him. Its not like we were a top 10 type team looking like a contender and had it all figured out. We should've been giving him opportunities. There was no reason not to. Utter lack of bench development and hard headedly running his starters into the ground because he was afraid to go to his bench was an knowing issue with Hubert that he just wasn't growing out of with more HC experience. If you don't play them how are they supposed to develop? And his starters could do no wrong. Didn't matter what they did, they wouldn't get yanked and their playing time wouldn't decrease. But if a bench guy came in and made one mistake he was probably getting buried for three or four games. That's a recipe for your starters playing sloppy and your bench playing tight and scared. Saw it year after year.
×
×
  • Create New...