Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

House of dragon 4


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

The casting of some of the aged roles is laughable. For example in tonight's show, the one eyed prince looks older than the guy that is supposed to be his older brother. How some of the other characters don't look like they've aged a day despite the series jumping years between each episode is just as sad. That said, they've done an excellent job of aging and wasting away the king. He must have gotten most of the SFX budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

@Brooklyn 3.0 you only have 2 more episodes to go through. Might as well see how it goes.

Basically, the whole thing is a lead-up to what kills all the dragons and destroys the Targs away from the throne for what we know is in play for GOT

The action is a-comin' 

Indeed it is coming. However, dance of the dragons will play out over a couple of seasons. No way they do it all in 2 episodes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've been enjoying it, even with the subtitles turned on.  Yes, it's not as action-packed as GOT, but there's nothing wrong with a little bit of political maneuvering to set the stage.

There are WAY too many characters named Aegon.  Can barely tell who's who without a printed family tree

(and there are supposed to be even more children running around that they haven't had a chance to introduce yet)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The actor-changing is what makes it hard to like. We fell in love with Arya, Jon, Jaime, etc. from day one. Meanwhile on HOTD we've had characters played by 3 different actors in eight episodes. Not to mention, as time went on, nobody like Daenerys on GOT. And dragons, big deal. No one cares about these blonde-headed psychos.

I pretty much think HOTD was created for straight females and straight females only. Downton Abbey with a bad boy with soap opera drama. That's their jam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're going to make a series out of a story that even casual fans already know the ending to, I'd prefer it were something like Aegon's Conquest. With this current show, we're basically watching the great Targaryen Empire go out with an pedo-incestuous whimper. 

Also, did they ever explain why Rhaenyra and Harwin's kids all had dark hair, but Viserys and Alicent's all had white hair? Are there different rules for genetics in Westeros?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2022 at 12:41 PM, Panther'sBigD said:

If they're going to make a series out of a story that even casual fans already know the ending to, I'd prefer it were something like Aegon's Conquest. With this current show, we're basically watching the great Targaryen Empire go out with an pedo-incestuous whimper. 

Also, did they ever explain why Rhaenyra and Harwin's kids all had dark hair, but Viserys and Alicent's all had white hair? Are there different rules for genetics in Westeros?

Gotta be dat man sperm, yo.

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

Quit after episode 3, started watching tonights episode. How in the name of Vishnu do you change actors to advance the storyline, yet leave at least 3 of the actors unchanged? Its just stupid that the princess now has 27 kids, yet Daemon is still the same? The exact same actor?

he did change his hairstyle.

but also, you can't have the same (22 year old actress) 14-year-old princess age-up over a 20 year timeframe without significant behind the scenes work.  Daemon was supposedly around 31 years old in epi 1 -- so it's still somewhat reasonable for the same actor to play the 51-year-old version of themselves in epi 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...