Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Positives from Today


OnlyPantherFaninMaine
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, rayzor said:

I'm not bothered. I expect to have plenty of chances to be disappointed by a team who "doesn't quit" but still manages to lose because they aren't built or managed to compete against average - good teams.

 

 

16 hours ago, ickmule said:

I wasted very little time watching, that was positive. 

 

15 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

My Sunday afternoons will remain free just like last season.

 

Too cool to watch the games. But...doesn't coming by here and telling us you are too cool to watch the game cancel the first cool out? So that would be a net zero. Sounds about right.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

 

 

Too cool to watch the games. But...doesn't coming by here and telling us you are too cool to watch the game cancel the first cool out? So that would be a net zero. Sounds about right.

- Don't spend 3 hours on a Sunday watching your team play a game

- Spend countless hours online during the week, bitching about said team and game

Sounds about right to me. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joemac said:

- Don't spend 3 hours on a Sunday watching your team play a game

- Spend countless hours online during the week, bitching about said team and game

Sounds about right to me. 

 

There are literally 100s of guys on this site. And we all see things our own way. Can't really expect everyone to agree. So, we should try to take others' views into account. That said, it is fun to make fun of them from time to time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

There are literally 100s of guys on this site. And we all see things our own way. Can't really expect everyone to agree. So, we should try to take others' views into account. That said, it is fun to make fun of them from time to time.

They'll change avatars, pretend like it never happened, and be back here posting positive things when we start winning again. This has happened on these forums plenty of times

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team fought back and had the lead in the 4th until 2 really bad calls by the refs changed the game. The defense stopped CLE from running down the clock when it really mattered, they refused to be bullied at the end. TE seem to be getting involved in this offense, I'd say Ian Thomas had a pretty good game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...