Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Team Stat Rankings through Week 1


Pantha-kun
 Share

Recommended Posts

OFFENSE 

Total offense : 28th 

Passing offense : 20th

Rushing offense : 31st

Points per Game : 10th 

DEFENSE 

Total defense : 17th

Passing defense : 2nd 

Rushing defense : 31st 

Points allowed per game : 26th

Turnover deferential : 27th

 

Ugly stuff. The only decent rakings we have are points per game and passing defense, and you could argue those are only high as a result of playing catch up and getting obliterated by the run so the browns didnt have to pass a bunch. 

Was kinda surprised we weren't last in rushing defense apparently that's the Titans. 

OFFENSE PLAYER STATS LEADERS

QB Baker Mayfield : 16/27 passing, 235 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 84.6 passer rating

RB Christian McCaffrey : 10 rush, 33 rush yards, 3.3 YPC, 1 TD

WR Robby Anderson : 5 receptions, 8 targets, 102 receiving yards, 20.4 YPR, 1 TD


DEFENSE

Damien Wilson : 1 sack (he has the teams only sack, the whole team is ranked somewhere near the bottom of the league only having one sack. IIRC Pitt and Buffalo lead the league in sacks with 7 total)

Xavier Woods : 10 tackles, Brian Burns, 8 tackles , Henry Anderson, 2 tackles for loss. 

0 INTS . O forced fumbles.

LOL 

 

Baker had bit of an ugly day with all the fumbles and that bad pick and the overall innaccuracy, but stats wise he looks kinda average if you don't take the fumbles into account (they don't show up on his stats line).

McCaffrey didnt have that many carries but even being said, 3.3 is rather low for him. But if you remember back to his rookie year when he was splitting carries with Jonathan Stewart he got very similar numbers out of similar work volumes of carries so in that sense it may not be too surprising. 

Robbie that was mosltly off that one pass in busted coverage but its encouraging at least.  If you remember his first two seasons he was also off to a big start and he subsequently disappeared last year, so keep an eye out for that. 

 

 

Edited by Pantha-kun
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The passing defense is heavily skewed because the Browns were not exactly starting Mahomes.  Our rushing offense was 31st because of our (curious) choice to not run the football, especially early.  Both of those numbers will probably bounce more toward the middle.

Unfortunately, the rushing defense may not move much.

It's one game, so I am not going to draw many conclusions and certainly not many beyond decisions and performances in one game.  The one to watch, IMO, is turnover differential.  Being 27th right now means next to nothing, other than the fact we didn't force any.  Had the one we did get stood, the entire outcome and how the game unfolded from there may have changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

There was context to last year's Total Defense ranking too, but people kept ignoring it 😕

Yeah last year Sam constantly turned it over or went 3 and out.  If they have a short field, they can't get as many yards.  Also they spent the last quarter just running the ball to end the game.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They had 8 sacks and we had 0. Ugh, Riddick may just indeed be missed.

Looking for droped passes. I remember 2 for the Browns but wanted to see how that played into the passing game and pass D. Couldn't find it tho.

 

They were officially credited with 4 sacks. Myles Garret lead the team with 2 sacks with 4 other Cleveland defenders recording a 0.5 sack

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • there is one common denominator in the 2003 & 2015 Carolina Panthers teams they both had ELITE top tier Qb play.  it would require a MVP type of season from Bryce Young to have the same type of success that Jake Delhomme had in  2003 & or Cam Newton in 2015 & lead this team to a SuperBowl is this going to happen or is there any reason to believe Bryce Young is capable of playing similar to Jake Delhomme in 2003 or Cam Newton in 2015 ? well no there is no absolutely NO reason whatsoever to believe that this is going to happen in 2026 ..just saying 
    • I'd actually like to see Cherelus get a fair shot to win the job in camp. Wallace is decent in drop zone coverage, but he gets abused in the play action game and is often times out of position in the run game. It might just be me, but I swear every time I watch Wallace play, I see multiple plays a game were it looks like he's just trying to be blocked. Watching Cherelus last year he at least looked like he was trying to hit someone on every play. Wallace plays like a LB who doesn't trust what he sees and it makes him passive and cautious versus Cherelus who regardless of if his decision is right or wrong goes at it 100%. 
    • Agreed.  Hasn’t happened to me either, but I feel very strongly about it.  That’s not just one of the worst things a woman could do to a man, it’s a power inherent to only women and is one of the worst things a HUMAN being can do to another.  A man can’t “hide” a pregnancy or maternity.  It’s impossible.  And that sucks for anyone that has to go through that. I always got a weird vibe off her and just found her very unlikeable.  Annoying even.  I’ve always been good at reading people and there was just something about her to me that was off-putting, somewhere under the surface.  And here we are…  she is despicable.
×
×
  • Create New...