CMC/Chubb run usage - next gen chart

[CRA]

Just a night and day difference in how the Browns and Panthers opted to threaten the opposing D w/ the run. 

 

[TheCasillas]

It appears we avoided Clowney and Garrett with our run selection.

[CRA]

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

It appears we avoided Clowney and Garrett with our run selection.

maybe we should look to upgrade our RB.   Maybe we could pay big bucks and get one of the best RBs in the NFL.  Oh wait.   

[theinstrumental]

That is an outside zone distribution vs a gap/power distribution. There’s nothing wrong with either emphasis. The difference on Sunday was in the execution of the teams’ offensive and defensive lines.

[WestPanthers]

I bet some of the huddle will say - " Come on, you're not going to open up all your offense playbook in game one"

[Panthering]

10 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It appears we avoided Clowney and Garrett with our run selection.

Avoiding Clowney in the run game makes sense, that's his bread and butter in the NFL. IDK how good Garrett's run defense is though. 

[TheCasillas]

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

maybe we should look to upgrade our RB.   Maybe we could pay big bucks and get one of the best RBs in the NFL.  Oh wait.   

another comment, where I just do not understand what you are attempting to state. I am offering rationale and then you give me : 

Edited September 13, 2022 by TheCasillas

[Ricky Spanish]

11 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It appears we avoided Clowney and Garrett with our run selection.

It appears we avoided the run

[Khyber53]

4 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

That is an outside zone distribution vs a gap/power distribution. There’s nothing wrong with either emphasis. The difference on Sunday was in the execution of the teams’ offensive and defensive lines.

And willingness to use their RB.

[TheCasillas]

Just now, Ricky Spanish said:

It appears we avoided the run

I agree. We did. That was my complaint on game day. The challenge to running an RPO with the QB making the decisions to pass or hand off when playing in a passionate game against a former team...... the QB wants the ball. 

 

Its the opposite of Shane Falco.

[07579394]

Chubb ran off tackle routes were the most damage,our DE sucked

[TheCasillas]

2 minutes ago, 07579394 said:

Chubb ran off tackle routes were the most damage,our DE sucked

Not all of those were off tackle runs by design. We met Chubb in the backfield a handful of times, just couldnt wrap him up and he broke it to the outside. Cleveland had over 180 yards after contact. It doesnt appear to be a gap integrity issue (excep the hunt touchdown run) it appears to be a tackling issue. 

That being said.... Chubb is fuging elite.

[Mr. Scot]

8 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

It appears we avoided the run

And they knew it

[CRA]

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

another comment, where I just do not understand what you are attempting to state. I am offering rationale and then you give me : /cdn-cgi/mirage/09011f1e3eb3d2b570377016ffacee468720583f-1663082287-1800/1280/https://media1.giphy.com/media/10bTAtcXeGNQJO/200.gif

I’m stating that rational is dumb if true. The gameplan was dumb. 

best run of the game was not a McAdoo play call.  CMC picked up a botched snap and got into space…..took it 30 yards.   You would think he might of learned something from watching it.   And you would think it would be something he figured out before week 1.