Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Roar - Aftermath


mrcompletely11
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, BrianS said:

Wow, great insight.  Rhule is a bad coach, WE ALL GET IT.

That doesn't excuse the officiating.  I don't care if Chip Kelly is on the sideline.  The officiating needs to be right.  It wasn't.  It's an issue.

Have you looked at the Ref's Screwed Us thread.

You must annihilate all opponents  so the refs don't matter.  The refs decided the game because we suck. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Wow.  So insightful.  No clutter there.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You've been mostly spamming emojis for the last 48 hours. We both know it's a facade you're BIG mad and if we had won the game you would have been rubbing it in the nose of every single person who had even the most vague criticism of Matt Rhule. You need help.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

Wow, great insight.  Rhule is a bad coach, WE ALL GET IT.

That doesn't excuse the officiating.  I don't care if Chip Kelly is on the sideline.  The officiating needs to be right.  It wasn't.  It's an issue.

Officiating is always a problem and sloppy like everything else early. It's a win some lose some reality. Like when Luke held Gronk and we won. Or Cam getting free hits to his helmet opening game 2016.

The officiating stunk but it was not the reason we lost. Hell you can hang that on time management alone in this game becaude it literally lost the game.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

You've been mostly spamming emojis for the last 48 hours. We both know it's a facade you're BIG mad and if we had won the game you would have been rubbing it in the nose of every single person who had even the most vague criticism of Matt Rhule. You need help.

🤣🤣🤣
Oh no. I'm in a great mood.  Looking forward to seeing CRA with his new avatar. 

But, oh yeah I'm going to celebrate every win.  We beat the Browns last week, we just couldn't beat the Browns and the zebras.

Hey didn't you predict we'd win?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, frankw said:

Oh no not cluttered threads that would really spoil our party celebrating our 10-24 record with Matt Rhule!

We all know this isn't a joke you two celebrate losses... because you love defeat.

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-aftermath-panthers-lose-season-opener-to-the-browns/id1523253913?i=1000579399986

 

Damn good podcast basically breaking down inadequacies of the coaching and game plan

 

This is a must listen.  John and Billy bring it

 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

🤣🤣🤣
Oh no. I'm in a great mood.  Looking forward to seeing CRA with his new avatar. 

But, oh yeah I'm going to celebrate every win.  We beat the Browns last week, we just couldn't beat the Browns and the zebras.

Hey didn't you predict we'd win?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I still think we eek out 7 or 8 wins but it's going to be a bumpy ass ride and this run defense isn't getting magically better nor is the offensive line depth. It was fun seeing folks doing victory laps over our free agent acquisitions but those of us who have seen the stories play out before knew to wait and see.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...