Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Igo, any credence to this?


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I will say with confidence that is not how we are playing Chinn. Xavier was our FS on Sunday, we had chinn in the box the majority of the game.

They did mostly play him deep in preseason, couldn't catch the all 22 of the CLE game but hopefully he keeps similar numbers up

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

They did mostly play him deep in preseason, couldn't catch the all 22 of the CLE game but hopefully he keeps similar numbers up

 

It appeared to me that we had Chinn on Njoku the majority of the game (explains the low amount of targets and catches) from what I saw. On obvisous passing downs and no TE, Chinn played back. Which Im not against bc his speed and size is terrifying for QBs. ie: the ridicilous interception from camp in front DJ.

The only play that bit us in the ass where Chinn was deep, that appeared he could play the ball better, was the screen play to hunt on 3rd and long. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

It HAS to be.

Quoting: "former NFL veteran of many years (not currently a Panther), who still has very close ties to the organization, and to a certain coach in particular"

Boston is the first one that comes to mind, with the coach being Wilks.

Could also be someone like AJ Klein, I suppose, though Boston would seem to make more sense.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Quoting: "former NFL veteran of many years (not currently a Panther), who still has very close ties to the organization, and to a certain coach in particular"

Boston is the first one that comes to mind, with the coach being Wilks.

Could also be someone like AJ Klein, I suppose, though Boston would seem to make more sense.

Klein isnt close to this org or staff. It would have to be someone rather close to the business. If it is indeed Boston, then we know how he embelishes, and then we know how media types embelish. If someone would scrape Boston's social media, we could see if someone of this is in there. 

 

The other person could be Stantley McClover considering how much love he has for Brian Burns and I think he lost his hype job for the panthers?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Totally wild and believable if true. Doesn't quite jive with the enthusiasm the team has started with this seasons though.

Can you name any team that doesn’t present overall enthusiasm before a season?  Generally speaking everyone puts on that face. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Klein isnt close to this org or staff. It would have to be someone rather close to the business. If it is indeed Boston, then we know how he embelishes, and then we know how media types embelish. If someone would scrape Boston's social media, we could see if someone of this is in there.

The other person could be Stantley McClover considering how much love he has for Brian Burns and I think he lost his hype job for the panthers?

McClover would make sense with regard to Burns, but what coach that's currently on staff would he have ties to?

(he was here under Fox)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Can you name any team that doesn’t present overall enthusiasm before a season?  Generally speaking everyone puts on that face. 

Jimmy Garrapaolo 

kirk Cousins

Jalen Ramsey 

Antonio brown 

Terrel Owens

Khalil Mack

 

Each had their own situation but definitely showed discern for their upcoming season with the team at the time of the behavior. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure, there's definitely a chance that a fire sale in 2022 could've paid off but I don't think that's a certainty. It's not just about stockpiling the picks and bettering odds; it's about hitting on those picks, having a stable coaching staff to develop them, and keeping the locker room engaged. We didn't exactly have a model front office nor stable coaching staff in 2022. It's worth noting that part of the reason that DJ had to be included in the trade up for #1 was because the Bears needed an immediate, proven WR1 to help Fields. It was him or another immediate first-round pick, not a future one like what was being offered for Burns (whom teams knew that things were shaky with and that they could afford to wait). As for the Eagles, they recovered because the foundation was already in place. Pederson got flak and was ultimately fired (and was just fired again this offseason from the Jags). Their recovery was quick because the foundation was already in place: Howie Roseman and a solid roster (that included a stacked OL, a second year QB, and a veteran defense). Philly had a margin of error that just wasn't available to Carolina. I'm not against using the draft to rebuild, but a full-on teardown comes with real consequences: fan disengagement, a fractured locker room, poor development, a losing environment... and I don't believe that we had the necessary leadership at the time to cleanly navigate it. That's a gamble that I want no part of.  Now that we do have a staff that seems to be in complete alignment and building for the future rather than fighting for their jobs, I'm more inclined to observe their process and see where it leads rather than backseat driving with "perfect" hindsight. 
    • I see it a bit differently considering there is only 20M in cap space. Given how many of the premium positions are on rookie contracts their cap should not be nearly maxed out. Tillis still has a lot of work to do before these rookies will need a second contract. 
×
×
  • Create New...