Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why aren't we acquiring compensatory picks?


DMathematics
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, DMathematics said:

We were both wrong but he acted like he was right for me being wrong lmao 

We traded him for a 5th that’s correct. It CAN become a 4th at best. He wasn’t wrong you were when you said 3rd and then had a little meltdown over it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Every move we make is a knee jerk move to try to win now. There's no long term vision or plan.

Pretty much...

Despite the talk, we've never really been in rebuild mode or even build mode, for that matter.

We've spent the vast majority of our time in either "win now' mode or "save my ass" mode.

They should have changed their slogan to "Rome wasn't built in a day...but we're damn sure gonna try!"

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

We traded him for a 5th that’s correct. It CAN become a 4th at best. He wasn’t wrong you were when you said 3rd and then had a little meltdown over it. 

 If he plays 75% of the snaps a 4th is more than a 5th no? Then he said I was wrong and posted if was a 5th I posted the evidence that its a 4th its over after that honestly 

Edited by DMathematics
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

DMathematics doesn't know the difference between the number 3 and the number four 🤣

4 is more than 5 no? So we gave up more than what you said lmao not the flex you think it is on a message board full of strangers that don't even like their own family members but go off mu guy enjoy your Saturday baby boy

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty much...

Despite the talk, we've never really been in rebuild mode or even build mode, for that matter.

We've spent the vast majority of our time in either "win now' mode or "save my ass" mode.

They should have changed their slogan to "Rome wasn't built in a day...but we're damn sure gonna try!"

I guess it was 7 years to try to win every year.. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMathematics said:

Is he not going to play 75% of the snaps? He is the starting QB?

He is the 31st ranked starting QB who has an injury history. Who the hell knows what will happen? All I know is it’s guaranteed to be a 5th. Now show me how it’s a 3rd. Use your mathematics…

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The combination of negativity on this board mixed with idiots like OP is why I’ve cut my huddle time back by about 85% 

Theres a few brilliant posters in here but they get drowned out by the trolls. Unnecessarily bringing up nonsensical ideas relating to the team, political garbage to insight a reaction, or simply spamming the “Tepper, Rhule bad” narrative as though we are all unaware of what a disaster the team has become. 
 

Meh. The huddle has turned pretty stale. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty much...

Despite the talk, we've never really been in rebuild mode or even build mode, for that matter.

We've spent the vast majority of our time in either "win now' mode or "save my ass" mode.

They should have changed their slogan to "Rome wasn't built in a day...but we're damn sure gonna try!"

The sad thing is that Rhule had the opportunity and the good will with Tepper to actually formulate and execute a long term plan but after two years of knee jerk moves leading to back to back 5 win seasons with no logical clear path forward, he was forced to stay the course of knee jerk moves and it's shaping up predictably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...