Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offers for Burns

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

He’s an excellent pass rusher. But it’s not an all-around defense end. A team that is very close that needs pure pass rusher  Burns is your guy. He’s a missing piece for a team that needs someone to do nothing but rush the passer

So not a JAG. Which is what I was saying. He is excellent at a very desirable skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
toldozer Grand Master

toldozer

Posted
Posted

Yeah we have to trade him. Why would he want to sign a long term deal here when it's a huge unknown If we'll get the qb position right. If it's the eagles 2 firsts in the draft you run and do it. Then we can decide if there is a qb we like head and shoulders above the rest. If not we take Anderson #1 and take our top qb left at the top 10 pick that should be the saints pick. That should still get us hooker or levis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted

Some of you guys are stupid as hell.


You can be sure that Philly isn't including the current top 5 pick in the mix or it would be automatic yes.

For all we know, these aren't even 2023 1st rounders.    Burns might not be top 5 DE but is absolutely top 10.

 

Why do you think these teams are offering multiple first rounders for him?  Because he's good as poo.  And still has tons of room to grow.  He is the cornerstone piece on defense to build the team around.  You absolutely cannot trade him unless the picks are astronomical.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gucceland Enthusiast

Gucceland

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

You don't think credible sports reporters verify info from one organization from other sources? That's basically the difference between guys like Shefter and the bottom feeders who just print rumors unsubstantiated.  Those guys count on people not paying attention over time to whether their rumors have any truth behind them. You know who pays attention over time? 

Mr Scot.  Why dont' you ask him who he regards as credible?

You seem to be constructing a reality out of whole cloth that suits your narrative without actually worrying about what's true beyond your own opinion.

 

Reporters are just that...reporters.  The report the information given them.  Anyone with the slightest business sense understands the advantages of driving up the price and the best way to do that is to get the information out there via reporters.  Reporters are only as credible as their source.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gucceland said:

Reporters are just that...reporters.  The report the information given them.  Anyone with the slightest business sense understands the advantages of driving up the price and the best way to do that is to get the information out there via reporters.  Reporters are only as credible as their source.  

Hence the gist of my post being about good reporters verifying information through mulitples sources in different organizations. Congratulations, you've failed at reading comprehension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gucceland Enthusiast

Gucceland

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Not true, they legit such as person and newton said multiple times it owuld be tough to get a 1 for CMC.

Adam Schefter being used by Carolina to drive up CMC price...just like Burns price.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gucceland Enthusiast

Gucceland

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Hence the gist of my post being about good reporters verifying information through mulitples sources in different organizations. Congratulations, you've failed at reading comprehension.

Congratulations...you failed on business comprehension.  How exactly can a good reporter verify multiple sources that work for the Panthers btw on an offer that was not accepted?  Have you ever negotiated anything in your life?  Do you have a clue how the "real" world works?  I think not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted
Just now, Gucceland said:

Congratulations...you failed on business comprehension.  How exactly can a good reporter verify multiple sources that work for the Panthers btw on an offer that was not accepted?  Have you ever negotiated anything in your life?  Do you have a clue how the "real" world works?  I think not.

*sighs* If someone offered two firsts for Burns, you check with your sources around the league until you identify one who confirms from the team that offered. Obviously, as the reporter you can't state which team, because that would come pretty close to outting your source with his own team. 

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you, or are you the sole arbiter of how the real world works?

Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...