Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Welp.. Levis, Hooker or McKee come on down.


panthersgreenville
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

With only one qb on the roster, and he is obviously hurt, there is no way in hades we are not going to draft a qb no matter our pick.  Even if that means we have to over draft one.  This is especially true with a new coach rolling in.  I still think we are around 5ish so its a moot point

Just saying weirder things have happened.  Also, drafting a QB just for the sake of drafting one seldomly works out.  If the available guy(s) at the correct value are not the player the new staff wants, then they won't pull the trigger.  If we miss out on Stroud and Levis, I'm not sure the team goes all in on Young or Hooker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Tannér McKee if we miss out on the big three.

image.png.d4c5116181da8e6560ee0cc0e2f529b0.png

Why, because he 6'6"? His TD to INT is pretty bad.  If he's struggling to hit 2:1 in college, what makes you thik he's going to improve upon that in the NFL?  He's not overly athletic and the ball doesn't jump out of his hand. 

Perfect example of why NOT to draft a QB just because he's sitting on the draft board and it's a need.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...