Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

See what happens when you take the training wheels off


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't get me wrong, I don't give Wilks much chance of losing the "Interim" label, but he mostly did a good job today. Mostly! He looked like an NFL coach today.

 

Anyway, today should be the model as to why you spread the ball around, and actually let guys play as opposed to letting them waste away on the bench. 

If you open up the playbook, and let guys get an opportunity to execute, good things happen. Relying on one dude for so much of your offense (who is not the QB, of course) is NOT a formula for long term success, especially for a team without a franchise QB. 

These guys are in the NFL,  and when it comes down to it, they should be allowed to contribute, particularly when things are going south and other people aren't getting it done.

Great overall win. Nice game plan. Walker looked like a different guy today.  If we can beat the Bucs, we should be able to beat just about anybody on any given Sunday.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Don't get me wrong, I don't give Wilks much chance of losing the "Interim" label, but he mostly did a good job today. Mostly! He looked like an NFL coach today.

 

Anyway, today should be the model as to why you spread the ball around, and actually let guys play as opposed to letting them waste away on the bench. 

If you open up the playbook, and let guys get an opportunity to execute, good things happen. Relying on one dude for so much of your offense (who is not the QB, of course) is NOT a formula for long term success, especially for a team without a franchise QB. 

These guys are in the NFL,  and when it comes down to it, they should be allowed to contribute, particularly when things are going south and other people aren't getting it done.

Great overall win. Nice game plan. Walker looked like a different guy today.  If we can beat the Bucs, we should be able to beat just about anybody on any given Sunday.

Wilks  learned from last week.  It was a great game!

PJ looked  better than Baker today. Baker's play has been absolute ass.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Wilks  learned from last week.  It was a great game!

PJ looked  better than Baker today. Baker's play has been absolute ass.

This was arguably the best that we've seen by a QB since number 1 was hurt.

Edited by top dawg
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Don't get me wrong, I don't give Wilks much chance of losing the "Interim" label, but he mostly did a good job today. Mostly! He looked like an NFL coach today.

 

Anyway, today should be the model as to why you spread the ball around, and actually let guys play as opposed to letting them waste away on the bench. 

If you open up the playbook, and let guys get an opportunity to execute, good things happen. Relying on one dude for so much of your offense (who is not the QB, of course) is NOT a formula for long term success, especially for a team without a franchise QB. 

These guys are in the NFL,  and when it comes down to it, they should be allowed to contribute, particularly when things are going south and other people aren't getting it done.

Great overall win. Nice game plan. Walker looked like a different guy today.  If we can beat the Bucs, we should be able to beat just about anybody on any given Sunday.

Agree with everything except your last sentence. The Bucs are terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...