Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foreman/Hubbard combo ain't too damn bad.

YourLastThought

By YourLastThought,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
Just now, KSpan said:

Has he ever shown any kind of ability to evaluate OL talent? Rhule sucked.

I just can't believe it.  With how good Campen is of a position coach, you'd think he would've said something...just wonder if Rhule forced the Elf thing because he sucked lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
Just now, davos said:

I just can't believe it.  With how good Campen is of a position coach, you'd think he would've said something...just wonder if Rhule forced the Elf thing because he sucked lol

I expect this game to be much more of an outlier than the norm as the season goes on but I have zero faith that Rhule trusted/deferred entirely to anyone on the staff. Might just be my bias though.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KSpan said:

I expect this game to be much more of an outlier than the norm as the season goes on but I have zero faith that Rhule trusted/deferred entirely to anyone on the staff. Might just be my bias though.

 

Yeah, the Bucs are a slow motion trainwreck right now but the line looked very good.  The Bucs offense is in shambles, but we faired really well against arguably the best run-D in the league.  That was the surprising thing for me.  The communication at the line was excellent.  

I don't expect many more wins, but that was nice.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's not. Some may believe I'm crazy, but Hubbard might need to be the lead back and Foreman the third-down guy. 

And for the record, I've always thought that Hubbard's running ability was better than what people saying here were letting on, but his hands suck. If Hubbard could get his hands together, he'd be more than solid.

All that being said, we need to draft someone to add to the competition next year.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...