Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derrick Brown is really starting to dominate


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Young defensive lineman has his best year in year 3.......

That is probably closer to the norm than the guy who is elite his rookie year.

 

Where have you been? The huddle wanted him cut or traded halfway into his rookiebyear. A few of us said "wait until year 3". Now the huddle loves him of course.

 

I sort of want Darnold back to see how he could do without Rhule and Joe Brady.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Where have you been? The huddle wanted him cut or traded halfway into his rookiebyear. A few of us said "wait until year 3". Now the huddle loves him of course.

 

I sort of want Darnold back to see how he could do without Rhule and Joe Brady.

I think all player evaluations/opinions made under Rhule's regime need to be rethought or evaluated again.  Just me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think all player evaluations/opinions made under Rhule's regime need to be rethought or evaluated again.  Just me.

Baker and Darnold both need to be off this roster as fast as possible.   Stop with all this "we need to see them without rhule"  we have and they suck.   Why in the fug would we resign either even if they played better then when rhule was coach? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think all player evaluations/opinions made under Rhule's regime need to be rethought or evaluated again.  Just me.

I'm not sure they need any real re-evaluation.  Just assume what he decided was wrong and move on from there.  It is probably not worth spending the resources looking for the remote possibility that he got anything right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Baker and Darnold both need to be off this roster as fast as possible.   Stop with all this "we need to see them without rhule"  we have and they suck.   Why in the fug would we resign either even if they played better then when rhule was coach? 

I said this in some other random thread, but 2023 offers us the opportunity to reset the QB room without the burden of the past "methodology."  We have one QB under contract for 2023, and we should see that as an opportunity.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Where have you been? The huddle wanted him cut or traded halfway into his rookiebyear. A few of us said "wait until year 3". Now the huddle loves him of course.

 

I sort of want Darnold back to see how he could do without Rhule and Joe Brady.

It wasn't year 1 for me, but it was definitely in year 2. That dude didn't look like he even wanted to be out there. 

foolish of me to doubt Round 1 Draft Pick Hurney Magic 

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I'm not sure they need any real re-evaluation.  Just assume what he decided was wrong and move on from there.  It is probably not worth spending the resources looking for the remote possibility that he got anything right.

I think I used the wrong word when I said re-evaluation.  I'll use TMJ as an example.  There were threads of him being a bust and not able to get on the field.  Seems like now that Rhule is gone, he is getting on the field and showing promise.  Just wondering what other players  are in the same bucket.

Not sure if it is game plan or Rhule putting his hand into everything but the landscape seems to have changed.   I want to give some guys the benefit of the doubt before drawing too many conclusions based on how I felt about them when Rhule was in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think I used the wrong word when I said re-evaluation.  I'll use TMJ as an example.  There were threads of him being a bust and not able to get on the field.  Seems like now that Rhule is gone, he is getting on the field and showing promise.  Just wondering what other players  are in the same bucket.

Not sure if it is game plan or Rhule putting his hand into everything but the landscape seems to have changed.   I want to give some guys the benefit of the doubt before drawing too many conclusions based on how I felt about them when Rhule was in charge.

Cool, say sam or baker plays better then they did under rhule.  Then what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Cool, say sam or baker plays better then they did under rhule.  Then what?

I think they are still stop gaps, just not as terrible as previously believed.  I'm thinking more around younger guys such as TMJ, Corral, maybe CJ and some other folks like that.   Just saying some guys may be able to showcase a bit more than they were when they were under Rhule's thumb.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think they are still stop gaps, just not as terrible as previously believed.  I'm thinking more around younger guys such as TMJ, Corral, maybe CJ and some other folks like that.   Just saying some guys may be able to showcase a bit more than they were when they were under Rhule's thumb.

But why give them reps?  We are not going to resign them. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think I used the wrong word when I said re-evaluation.  I'll use TMJ as an example.  There were threads of him being a bust and not able to get on the field.  Seems like now that Rhule is gone, he is getting on the field and showing promise.  Just wondering what other players  are in the same bucket.

Not sure if it is game plan or Rhule putting his hand into everything but the landscape seems to have changed.   I want to give some guys the benefit of the doubt before drawing too many conclusions based on how I felt about them when Rhule was in charge.

That is a valid point on our roster.  I think that the task at hand from the moment Rhule was fired was figuring out what we have on our roster, because like you say, he was good at impeding everything.

That said, I don't feel that way about Darnold and to a slightly lesser degree, Mayfield.  Darnold has shown the same limitations and downside under three coaching staffs over five years.  His completion percentage is a tad under 60% and his TD to Int. ratio is just over 1:1.  There is nothing to point to and that type of interception ratio is not what teams want out of backup QBs.

Mayfield's case is a little stronger, in that he had one good season, his completion percentage is a tick over 61 and his TD to Int. ration is a bit over 3:2.  His worst season in all those things has been this one......under Captain Process.  Somebody might be interested in signing him as a backup, and maybe as a sleeper if they have an aging vet as a starter.  There is nothing there that says he should be built around, but he could get a look.

I realize both these guys have played five years in mostly awful situations, but after that long, teams are likely to conclude Darnold is ruined and Mayfield is strongly headed that way. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...