Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Confirmed: Al Holcomb is not good at his job


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Not trying to give a rough time here but when it is said 

‘enough talent’

who exactly is that ?
 

Burns, Brown, Horn, and Henderson had enough to get drafted in the first.  Shaq and Woods are average, capable starters in this league.  Littleton and Wilson are below average but should not be getting crushed by a shaky OL and Mixon to the tune of 5 TDs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Burns, Brown, Horn, and Henderson had enough to get drafted in the first.  Shaq and Woods are average, capable starters in this league.  Littleton and Wilson are below average but should not be getting crushed by a shaky OL and Mixon to the tune of 5 TDs.  

They lined up offsides 4 times today - that's pure coaching ineptitude.

Snow was very good at his job and had his unit ready every week - sadly they were let down by the offence not being able to stay on the field / score points. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Smithers said:

Tried to tell y’all that the defense was going to be much worse off without Snow.  I despised Rhule, but Snows defense was good when not put in bad situations

Snows defense was crap. The guy behind him being crap isn't surprising. The only thing surprising is how you thought Snow was good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

You can’t openly disagree with the prior defensive coach…then take over…and make it look much worse. 
 

 

I know right?

This is the absolute worst the D has looked all year.  And not just this year, in YEARS.

The game was over in the 2nd quarter.

Tepper knew what he was doing choosing Wilks to do the tank.   Wilks took an 8-8 team in Arizona and drove it straight into the shlitter, the absolute worst team in the league.  The Arizona D was total shlt.

Before Wilks the problem was NOT the D , or ST.  But Wilks fired the DC and a ST coach.  Genius.

He kept McAdoo and instructed him to throw lots and lots of screens, so many that we actually had an average negative depth of target Wilk's first week.

Wilks is not trying to tank.  Its just comes naturally. 

Leader of men, to the worst first half of football in 50 years.  Where's his boot lickers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...