Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brugler: Next year's quarterbacks "not universally loved"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Im begining to agree... ive watched so much college football this year, and I just dont see the ascendance of elite prospects that I thought we would. Of course, things can change... but im not sure we see 2 QBs go in the top 10 this year. 

I think you will.  There's just too much desperation for qb help that teams will take 2 easily.  We are going to be one of those teams.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

So your telling me having another first next year would be a great option now...interesting.

kicking the can down the road isnt the answer.... just bc these kids out of college dont look elite doesnt mean they wont be great. The consensus is becoming that there is not a "sure-fire" pick. However, there are only two* QBs on winning teams right now that was a "sure-fire" pick. 

1. Burrow

2. Tua
 

Edited by TheCasillas
editted bc i forgot about Tua
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

How did we go from “This is a deep, amazing class” to “This class may have 1 or 2 starter level QBs”?

 

It happens every year. Predicting what qb's will emerge as top candidates a year early is a fools errand.  You have to let it play out in the year they come out and the last game is played. Then you will see who rises to the top.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I think you will.  There's just too much desperation for qb help that teams will take 2 easily.  We are going to be one of those teams.

I think people are still shellshocked from last year. When thr bar drops that low it begins to muddle the view because it is all up and so far at that.

Pretty much how we will be talking during the coach search after Frule.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think you will.  There's just too much desperation for qb help that teams will take 2 easily.  We are going to be one of those teams.

@LinvilleGorgehas me on this Anthony Richardson trade back plan... Pending who our new HC is... AND how Richardson finishes the season, I could be down with developing AR while backing up MC9.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

How did we go from “This is a deep, amazing class” to “This class may have 1 or 2 starter level QBs”?

 

it’s what you say when it starts to look like you’re not going to get the singular QB prospect you had your entire franchise waiting on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

kicking the can down the road isnt the answer.... just bc these kids out of college dont look elite doesnt mean they wont be great. The consensus is becoming that there is not a "sure-fire" pick. However, there are only two* QBs on winning teams right now that was a "sure-fire" pick. 

1. Burrow

2. Tua
 

Ohh I am fine with snagging a QB. There is zero excuse to not in this draft. It may not be a 1st but that debate can't really rage until we know where we are picking and who is available.

I was saying it would be nice to have that safety net to take another swing if the first one wasn't good enough. Another 1st in 2024 gives us a lot of options in a worst case scenario.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The panthers are such a trash organization at this point that all the huddle can do is argue about which panthers team is historically the worst…good times. 
    • Well, hope they're not worried about a torn Labrum or Rotator Cuff, as someone who went through that myself, I know those don't have anything show up on X-Rays but from the MRI, so this is kinda a nothing update, hope it's not a tear or his season is already over if they decide to do surgery now. Which is basically what would be needed to get him to 100% for the start of next season's training camp if it's a labrum.  If he plays the season with it and then does surgery, he's not going to be ready for camp and probably not the start of the season either.
    • I always try to not pay much attention to a team’s preseason win/loss record. The 1982 Washington and 2021 LA Rams both lost every game in the preseason and went on to win the Super Bowl, whereas the 2008 Detroit Lions and 2017 Cleveland Browns both won every game in reason and went on to lose every regular season game. There’s many examples of teams that lose in preseason that go on to have good seasons, but equally there are teams that lose in preseason and that continues in the regular season. Which will we be?  I think our floor is a handful of wins, while our ceiling will probably be around the 9-10 win mark. The latter will require significant improvement from the whole team and coaching staff, and will also need Bryce to play like the QB we drafted him to be. I want to be optimistic and predict a winning season, but it’s really difficult as a Panthers fan!
×
×
  • Create New...