Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams. Char observer on top 4 QBs Note, This is not in depth


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Any bridge FA veteran that can walk and chew gum at the same time. Corral may or may not make the roster next year; I’m indifferent either way.  Camp competition will sort that out.  

Where we appear to differ, I don’t think a really good HC and OC will risk ruining the rookie QB by throwing him to the wolves his first season.  Too many draft capital at risk to do that.  JMO, YMMV

Lots of factors. Depends on the FO power, the HC, OC, QB we drafted, QB roster, etc.

I just don't see any way that Richardson could possibly help us in the short term. That doesn't seem like a 1st round type of move considering where we will likely be drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

El OH EL at people shitting on Corral and doubting him being on the roster next year. 

Well if we draft a rookie in the first and whoever our next HC we get wants to bring in their own vet that knows their system. I could easily see Corral being dumped it’s not the smartest roster construction having 3 QBs in the 53. We’d try and stash him on the PS but another team with an established starter might pinch him to try and develop. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Richardson has a ton of physical talent but he’s a long way from being a franchise QB in the NFL.  It’s not impossible that he makes that leap, but I wouldn’t bet on it happening with this Panthers organization unfortunately.

I keep seeing this, but we will have an entirely different coaching staff in a few months. No way to know how QB friendly it will be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Lots of factors. Depends on the FO power, the HC, OC, QB we drafted, QB roster, etc.

I just don't see any way that Richardson could possibly help us in the short term. That doesn't seem like a 1st round type of move considering where we will likely be drafting.

I am intrigued by AR, but he does not seem like a top 5-10 pick right now. You're right. Now, if he falls to the 2nd...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I was bartending for the World Cup so I missed the second half once the Mexico game started, did Stroud drop off? Seemed like they started off pretty safe with the screen passes, that first td throw was nice

I was too busy to catch much of it but from what people are saying it sounds like he had a rough second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any thought to getting a vet QB, seeing what Corral has, and grabbing Hooker/Ward/McCall/Penix on day 2 or 3? I like Bryce but his ceiling might be a PJ that doesn't turn the ball over. I like Richardson but it's so hard to evaluate him being surrounded by a horrible team, bad WR's, D sucked, possibly injured because they wouldn't let him run, tons of upside and he looked like the only NFL player on his team but big gamble for a guy that needs to sit for a year

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

The person who posted the tweet is suggesting they return to a staff that hasn’t developed them. It just doesn’t make sense to me. 

He's basically saying Stroud isn't good enough for the NFL yet.

Pauline is a pretty well known draft analyst, but this isn't a widely held opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...