Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold is the best QB on this team


onmyown
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I’m still not sure Sam is any better than PJ Walker 

I do not want a single QB on the roster outside of Corral to be here next year.  

Who knows. 

But he has more physical tools than anyone in this draft. Might as well roll with him the rest of the year save a pick on Baker and see what happens.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Oh yeah what are my true colors?

Only a bigot or someone slow in the head would use the SB50 fumble as an opportunity to randomly denigrate one of the most important players in franchise history during a game against the Broncos.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Who knows. 

But he has more physical tools than anyone in this draft. Might as well roll with him the rest of the year save a pick on Baker and see what happens.

I don’t care who Wilks plays to finish out the year.  I don’t want any of these guys as backups next year. 

I didn’t watch today.  Not watching Sam Darnold or Baker.  I’m ready for the new coach search and a new page. 

I’m going to intentionally watch one more game of bad QB play with my college team this Saturday and I’m done this year watching my teams.  I’ll just watch random good games. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Only a bigot or someone slow in the head would use the SB50 fumble as an opportunity to randomly denigrate one of the most important players in franchise history during a game against the Broncos.

I'm such a bigot that I have biracial children and am pounding the desk for Penix.

Cam Newton should have been the best QB in history with his physical tools and he came up woefully short in my opinion. 

Great human being but only a Good QB

 

And not jumping on the fumble was as inexcusable as Kasay kicking the ball out of bounds.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I don’t care who Wilks plays to finish out the year.  I don’t want any of these guys as backups.   

I didn’t watch today.  Not watching Sam Darnold or Baker. 

I’m going to intentionally watch one more game of bad QB play with my college team this Saturday and I’m done this year watching my teams.  I’ll just watch random good games. 

 

He played well. Why wouldn't you watch?

I've never missed an actual game in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KatsAzz said:

Bingo!! I fully agree. Plus, Sam Darnold  has been  learning more about how the defense works and the looks they are giving him.

We need to remember Sam is only 25 years old, still learning and could show even more improvement  since he is presently on the best NFL team that he has been on, one that is giving him the protection ever quarterback needs.

I have no idea how Sam's long term career will play out here or someplace else, so my take is we will have to sit back and see what happens the rest of this season before passing complete judgement.

Geno Smith was a bust.  Remember?  Some times, it takes time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I'm such a bigot that I have biracial children and am pounding the desk for Penix.

Cam Newton should have been the best QB in history with his physical tools and he came up woefully short in my opinion. 

Great human being but only a Good QB

 

And not jumping on the fumble was as inexcusable as Kasay kicking the ball out of bounds.

So the latter then? You've gone on tangents about how much you dislike running quarterbacks because they can't win the big game multiple times just in the last month alone and moved the goalposts when people mention guys like Joe Montana and Steve Young. What does throwing out Penix here now mean is that supposed to sway the conversation after your remarks? Good talk. Enjoy your evening guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...