Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Teams are doing homework on Jim Harbaugh


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, rippadonn said:

You're on the side of renowned crazy FOs, I get it.

Batsh*t, turn over the apple cart, blow it all up, rebuild, rebuild, rebuild, I get it. That's just you though.

Well, the "batsh-t" folks made it back to the Super Bowl. They didn't win, but then neither did Harbaugh when he went.

Michigan is still waiting on that National Championship game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, the "batsh-t" folks made it back to the Super Bowl. They didn't win, but then neither did Harbaugh when he went.

Michigan is still waiting on that National Championship game.

That's not really a fair comparison.  The Big 10 is a level below the SEC talent regardless of what Michigan and Ohio St fans think.  He has been successful at Michigan.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Did the team ever issue YOU a uniform hot rod?

Nope, but if they had. Boy, I tell you what!  I would have single-handedly, with my scrappy gym rat personality, insured that 2001 season would have been completely different.  We would never have won that first we, would would have gone a perfect 0-16!
 

The world would be completely different, Popsickle would be enshrined in the ring of honor with Luke, Smitty and TD, cars would fly, ole Jerry wouldn’t have instituted casual fridays, and Harbaugh would still not coach the Panthers. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, the "batsh-t" folks made it back to the Super Bowl. They didn't win, but then neither did Harbaugh when he went.

Michigan is still waiting on that National Championship game.

He has the road map to that. You just have your opinion. Which is getting weaker the longer we go on here...

Jake Gyllenhaal Reaction GIF by MOODMAN

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That's not really a fair comparison.  The Big 10 is a level below the SEC talent regardless of what Michigan and Ohio St fans think.  He has been successful at Michigan.

But hadn't even beaten Ohio State till the past few years.

Point of the discussion there though was our increasingly angry sounding friend's suggestion that the 49ers were doing lousy since Harbaugh. Objectively speaking, they're actually doing pretty well right now.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

But hadn't beat Ohio State till the past few years.

Point of the discussion there though was our increasingly angry sounding friend's suggestion that the 49ers were doing lousy since Harbaugh. Objectively speaking, they're actually doing pretty well right now.

It took them 4 years to get to or above 500 after Harbaugh.  It's not like they slipped in a new HC and immediately were good.

You may not like Harbaugh and that's fine, but you can't argue against his winning percentage.  Belichick isn't well liked by everyone in his locker room either.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

It took them 4 years to get to or above 500 after Harbaugh.  It's not like they slipped in a new HC and immediately were good.

You may not like Harbaugh and that's fine, but you can't argue against his winning percentage.  Belichick isn't well liked by everyone in his locker room either.

He doesn't act like every coach. Let's be real, he can be awkward and weird acting.

Why do they put up with the guy who wears the same hoodie when he has millions of dollars. Has he ever heard of the team store?

He wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

It took them 4 years to get to or above 500 after Harbaugh.  It's not like they slipped in a new HC and immediately were good.

You may not like Harbaugh and that's fine, but you can't argue against his winning percentage.  Belichick isn't well liked by everyone in his locker room either.

Belichick minus Brady isn't exactly doing great.

I have no dislike for Harbaugh, but a lot of people who've worked with him have.

The problem with him though is that kind of never happy, always angry, constantly screaming persona used to be the norm in the NFL, but just doesn't work anymore. You can still get away with it at the college level, but in the pros what happened with Harbaugh in San Francisco is likely going to happen anywhere else he goes as well.

For the record, the coach we just fired at that same kind of personality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Belichick minus Brady isn't exactly doing great.

I have no dislike for Harbaugh, but a lot of people who've worked with him have.

The problem with him though is that kind of never happy, always angry, constantly screaming persona used to be the norm in the NFL, but just doesn't work anymore. You can still get away with it at the college level, but in the pros what happened with Harbaugh in San Francisco is likely going to happen anywhere else he goes as well.

For the record, the coach we just fired at that same kind of personality.

And we're back where we started.  The guy has a near 70% win rate.  For the record, I don't think he's going to leave Michigan because its honestly the perfect job for him.  I'm just flabbergasted you can argue against a proven success after you spent the last hiring cycle pounding your chest over Hackett.  Now if you wanna talk about things that don't work in the NFL..

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Duh. Harbaugh was an NFL QB. He's an OFFENSIVE minded coach.HE built an offense for one read Kreapernick and took them to the SB.

HE developed Andrew Luck.

Duh, that's why his teams are known for their defenses more so than offense.  San Fran and Michigan's calling card was/is defense.  Jim is hardly an innovative offensive guru despite being an ex-QB himself.  But you already knew that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...