Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Teams are doing homework on Jim Harbaugh

WarPanthers89

By WarPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

He's been successful on both stages. College AND the NFL.

He left the NFL after 4yrs with the 5th highest win percentage in history up there with John Madden and this is the guy you question.

You don't question Shane or Bienemy. Backwards. We KNOW what Jim Harbaugh will do for your team.

You wanted to bet on the hottest "new" much like Rhule was. All hype. No HC resume.

Ok. Have at that.

I question everybody.

I'm especially questioning your sobriety and/or memory right now because besides being vaguely threatening, you keep talking about me doing things I haven't done.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I question everybody.

I'm especially questioning your sobriety and/or memory right now because besides being vaguely threatening, you keep talking about me doing things I haven't done.

You loved Bienemy. Now you didn't/don't?

You questioned my six pack. I didn't start it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I question everybody.

I'm especially questioning your sobriety and/or memory right now because besides being vaguely threatening, you keep talking about me doing things I haven't done.

Bro. We're both Scot by heritage (1/3 here). I love you man. C'mon with all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Best coach Washington has had in this century. Could be that its more than just a coaching issue.  

As far as I can tell it’s only mr scot that’s against harbaugh which is pretty telling in itself.   If one cannot see how hiring him would be nothing short of amazing then that’s probably on you.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

You loved Bienemy. Now you didn't/don't?

You questioned my six pack. I didn't start it.

 

35 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

I'm very fit for my age Scot.

No, I wasn't a Bieniemy fan. Nor have I ever said a word (or frankly given a sh-t) about your "six pack". I have no idea where you're getting that stuff.

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

As far as I can tell it’s only mr scot that’s against harbaugh which is pretty telling in itself.

Wrong again, but that's the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

As far as I can tell it’s only mr scot that’s against harbaugh which is pretty telling in itself.   If one cannot see how hiring him would be nothing short of amazing then that’s probably on you.  

My comment wasn't a defense of Harbaugh.  Personally, I don't really like him, but if we hired him, I would be ok with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

How's our ownership doing?

Too small a sample size to judge at this point.

I know you don't like Tepper, but you have to admit that he is better than Snyder.  Not that being better than Snyder is setting the bar very high. 

Fwiw, I was defending Gibbs more than anything.  He probably is my all time favorite coach.   

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

Too small a sample size to judge at this point.

I know you don't like Tepper, but you have to admit that he is better than Snyder.  Not that being better than Snyder is setting the bar very high.  

Tepper's been generally bad so far.

He has a chance to improve, mostly by taking himself out of things.

Snyder? Not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sgt Schultz Grand Master

Sgt Schultz

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Too small a sample size to judge at this point.

I know you don't like Tepper, but you have to admit that he is better than Snyder.  Not that being better than Snyder is setting the bar very high.  

Well, Idi Amin was arguably better than Dan Snyder.  It's close, though.

Tepper is not the second-worst, either.  Khan, Haslam, Amy Adams Strunk, Mike Brown, Mark Davis, and Spanos would all be "ahead" of him on that list, and I am probably forgetting a few.  Jones is probably "ahead" of him, too, since he really believes he is a GM. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...