Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold


panthertime
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

You Darnold apologists really are a new bread of pathetic. 

Holy sh*t!  you actually replied to me!

It's a fuging miracle!

You know how many times I've replied to you and you just ignored me like an ass?

 

Time to throw a fuging party.   

TLGPanthersFan has finally gotten down from his high-perch and is speaking with the Peasants.  

This is truly a momentous occasion.  🧁

 

(dick)

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

He did. One of the ten worst passer ratings in league history. Blame the receivers if it helps you cope I guess lol.

Cope? Lighten up Francis.  I'm just pointing out a fact. I could care less either way. I profit none from it whether he plays well or not. 

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Cope? Lighten up Francis.  I'm just pointing out a fact. I could care less either way. I profit none from it whether he plays well or not. 

I think it's hilarious. I'm just just giving you the rundown of the numbers. Sam is the one laughing all the way to the bank at Scott Fitterer's expense 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The announcers pointed it out all game. It's OK if Sam didn't completely suck ass.

You know...Don't the announcers have a better view of the entire field and what's going on than we (the home viewer) do?

If they see more than we do and then state that Receivers weren't exactly getting open, then perhaps they weren't....you know....getting open? 🤔

It's weird, though..in the past games that Sam started, he did find some open receivers more often than not yet in this game, everyone was covered as if the entire Saints "D" had clones of Darrelle Revis all over each WR.  

Someone mentioned that MacAdoo is clueless when it comes to scheming against a Zone Defense and I think there is some truth to that after watching this abomination-of-a-game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

I think it's hilarious. I'm just just giving you the rundown of the numbers. Sam is the one laughing all the way to the bank at Scott Fitterer's expense 🤷‍♂️

I never said anything to the contrary.  I just said our wrs were covered all game, which is fact. You somehow took that as defending everything else. You seem to take offense to anyone that doesn't have outright contempt for Sam Darnold.  

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I never said anything to the contrary.  I just said our wrs were covered all game, which is fact. You somehow took that as defending everything else. You seem to take offense to anyone that doesn't have outright contempt for Sam Darnold.  

Ah so how dare anyone actually have standards and not keep blaming the WR's because the QB who is known for being awful and turning the ball over is awful and turns the ball over? Cool. Maybe we should bring in Andy Dalton in the offseason 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Ah so how dare anyone actually have standards and not keep blaming the WR's because the QB who is known for being awful and turning the ball over is awful and turns the ball over? Cool. Maybe we should bring in Andy Dalton in the offseason 👍

Why are you angry at me because the team is ass? I had nothing to do with this mess. You are just an angry little man that is in a rage because I'm not upset.  Have fun with that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...