Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Kafka was being groomed for the OC (and eventually the HC) role in Kansas City, but Bieniemy couldn't nail a HC interview so Kafka got sick of waiting and struck out to prove himself.

He's very, very highly thought of around the league.

then he should get hired in the coaching cycle. Not sure where he will land but looking forward to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cdparr7 said:

Ben Johnson gives me Adam Gase vibes

Ben Johnson didnt have Payton Manning to help catapult his career.  Anything specific about BJ that gives you these vibes? Any specific interviews you watched that they have the same mannerisms? Their offenses are nowhere near alike.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pure speculation but I do wonder how an interview with someone like Manuel goes given there's no official signed-HC. 

Rather than a Johnson pairing, we did already interview Shane.  Wonder if he's Steichen's preferred DC and we wanted to chat with him after a good interview.  

There's so many freaking candidates at all levels now, it's pretty wild.  And nothing finalized for any club.  It's a coaching interview circuit wild west.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Ben Johnson didnt have Payton Manning to help catapult his career.  Anything specific about BJ that gives you these vibes? Any specific interviews you watched that they have the same mannerisms? Their offenses are nowhere near alike.

Well for one, unrelated but Gase was also 36 when he got his first HC role.
 

Both came out of the NFCN. 

Both were various position coaches before becoming OCs.

Johnson was OC for 1 year.

Gase was technically OC for 2 years in Denver (but Manning was there so he was the real OC) then 1 year OC in Chicago. 
 

Both were/are being talked about as hot-poo OCs that are/were going to innovate the game.

I agree, their offense is different. Johnson’s is much less complex than what Gase ran. 
 

Also, what team that Johnson has been apart of (ever) had success in the NFL?

BE54B204-80F9-4475-9B0D-B58FF5056B54.jpeg

45E8A73B-7DCF-46A8-B8C5-EA533B967E8C.jpeg

7DE6D119-53C2-49CA-953C-4C150B35B6D3.jpeg

6FCCF916-6E6E-4234-8224-5772EB0AD9E6.jpeg

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...