Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 45catfan said:

If DJ could get open, Sam wouldn't have to force it.  I still think it's hilarious that people are taking up for a QB on another team, but won't accept the short comings on this roster.

Yeah man, that's totally why Sam underthrew him. Great quarterbacks always throw short into double coverage.

Clowns.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

If D.J. Moore wasn't so good at turning into a defensive back then Sam wouldn't even have "decent" statistics.

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

Where the f-ck does 15/32 come from?

I'm referring to this from YOU :

Have you been thinking I was talking about something else entirely? 

Well, we can jump back to 16/32 if you want to consider him average.

Okay, 16/32.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHornet said:

That's my preferred route too. Also more fun for fans instead of the cycle we've been in the last three years.

Bridge qbs keep you mired in mediocrity. That's all we've had since we lost Cam. It's time to suck it up and start the draft pick or Corrall and move on. Let the chips fall where they may.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

Blah, blah, blah.

76vtpw.jpg

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

Yeah man, that's totally why Sam underthrew him. Great quarterbacks always throw short into double coverage.

Clowns.

Yeah man, we got a win with a QB that didn't have his best game and WRs that didn't help him out at all.  But hey, I know would rather have taken the loss.  That's a clown--or at least a crappy fan.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

And when did the argument switch to whether Sam is a bust or not?  

The goal posts seem to be moving at Warp speed here, Captain.

There is no argument on that.  Sam Darnold is a massive bust. 

It's just a fact that happens to come up when someone wants to talk about him playing here in 2023.  There is no reason for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gerry Green said:

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

If you are talking about this season you can't simply ignore one of his 7 games.  Care to check out his career rating while you are at it?  He looked solid through 5 starts last season as well and we all know how that ended...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

1 game. Now do the 6 before that. I dare you.

Oh, don't want to include that one game against an awful divisional opponent now? Okay, so you only want to cherry pick the 5 previous, or do you want to remove a few of those too? Maybe another divisional opponent? Certainly, you don't want to include his first year in Carolina or his rookie years in New York.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...