Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 45catfan said:

If DJ could get open, Sam wouldn't have to force it.  I still think it's hilarious that people are taking up for a QB on another team, but won't accept the short comings on this roster.

Yeah man, that's totally why Sam underthrew him. Great quarterbacks always throw short into double coverage.

Clowns.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

If D.J. Moore wasn't so good at turning into a defensive back then Sam wouldn't even have "decent" statistics.

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

Where the f-ck does 15/32 come from?

I'm referring to this from YOU :

Have you been thinking I was talking about something else entirely? 

Well, we can jump back to 16/32 if you want to consider him average.

Okay, 16/32.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHornet said:

That's my preferred route too. Also more fun for fans instead of the cycle we've been in the last three years.

Bridge qbs keep you mired in mediocrity. That's all we've had since we lost Cam. It's time to suck it up and start the draft pick or Corrall and move on. Let the chips fall where they may.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

Blah, blah, blah.

76vtpw.jpg

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

Yeah man, that's totally why Sam underthrew him. Great quarterbacks always throw short into double coverage.

Clowns.

Yeah man, we got a win with a QB that didn't have his best game and WRs that didn't help him out at all.  But hey, I know would rather have taken the loss.  That's a clown--or at least a crappy fan.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

And when did the argument switch to whether Sam is a bust or not?  

The goal posts seem to be moving at Warp speed here, Captain.

There is no argument on that.  Sam Darnold is a massive bust. 

It's just a fact that happens to come up when someone wants to talk about him playing here in 2023.  There is no reason for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gerry Green said:

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

If you are talking about this season you can't simply ignore one of his 7 games.  Care to check out his career rating while you are at it?  He looked solid through 5 starts last season as well and we all know how that ended...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

1 game. Now do the 6 before that. I dare you.

Oh, don't want to include that one game against an awful divisional opponent now? Okay, so you only want to cherry pick the 5 previous, or do you want to remove a few of those too? Maybe another divisional opponent? Certainly, you don't want to include his first year in Carolina or his rookie years in New York.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...