Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 45catfan said:

If DJ could get open, Sam wouldn't have to force it.  I still think it's hilarious that people are taking up for a QB on another team, but won't accept the short comings on this roster.

Yeah man, that's totally why Sam underthrew him. Great quarterbacks always throw short into double coverage.

Clowns.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

If D.J. Moore wasn't so good at turning into a defensive back then Sam wouldn't even have "decent" statistics.

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

Where the f-ck does 15/32 come from?

I'm referring to this from YOU :

Have you been thinking I was talking about something else entirely? 

Well, we can jump back to 16/32 if you want to consider him average.

Okay, 16/32.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHornet said:

That's my preferred route too. Also more fun for fans instead of the cycle we've been in the last three years.

Bridge qbs keep you mired in mediocrity. That's all we've had since we lost Cam. It's time to suck it up and start the draft pick or Corrall and move on. Let the chips fall where they may.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

Blah, blah, blah.

76vtpw.jpg

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

Yeah man, that's totally why Sam underthrew him. Great quarterbacks always throw short into double coverage.

Clowns.

Yeah man, we got a win with a QB that didn't have his best game and WRs that didn't help him out at all.  But hey, I know would rather have taken the loss.  That's a clown--or at least a crappy fan.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

And when did the argument switch to whether Sam is a bust or not?  

The goal posts seem to be moving at Warp speed here, Captain.

There is no argument on that.  Sam Darnold is a massive bust. 

It's just a fact that happens to come up when someone wants to talk about him playing here in 2023.  There is no reason for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gerry Green said:

 

IF, blah blah blah. I just think it's funny how you jump through hoops to downplay the fact Sam had a decent year. I know...it's a tough pill to swallow.

 

In the last 6 games, before yesterdays debacle, Sam led the league in QB rating. OUCH.

If you are talking about this season you can't simply ignore one of his 7 games.  Care to check out his career rating while you are at it?  He looked solid through 5 starts last season as well and we all know how that ended...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

1 game. Now do the 6 before that. I dare you.

Oh, don't want to include that one game against an awful divisional opponent now? Okay, so you only want to cherry pick the 5 previous, or do you want to remove a few of those too? Maybe another divisional opponent? Certainly, you don't want to include his first year in Carolina or his rookie years in New York.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Or just don't be an ass and hang out in the left lane. Just use common courtesy. The people who tailgate and be an ass are no better and its not a surprise that a lot of road rage incidents occur when inconsiderate people and assholes cross paths. Just make an effort not to be either. "Not allowing the bully to bully you" is also being an inconsiderate ass to the people behind the "bully" who would also like you to GTFO of the left lane.
    • It was completely disgusting and the most obvious fix I’ve ever witnessed. Deflating. It’s probably gone on for decades but high def TV has truly outed the egregious ‘officiating’. When was the last time a small market team was allowed to win a SB?  Offensive holding is it, and it’s so predictable. 2nd and 7 turns in to 2nd and 17. Defense pins their ears back, covers the slot guy and TE roaming the middle, and watches for the WR/RB screen. D line needs to maintain gap integrity. The deep shot to the WR down the sideline is a low percentage play so no real worry there. Most average O lines won’t be able to convert.  Loser getting too close to FG range in a close game? Holding. Winner needs a short field? Holding. DCs love them some obvious passing downs. Narrows down the playbook and significantly puts the odds in their favor. Put a team in 2nd/3rd and long all day and they are NOT going to win that game. It would be interesting to do a statistical analysis of the relationship of holding calls and game outcomes.  This is where having skill position people that can go yard on any given play is so valuable. 
    • It can still be enjoyable.  I don't think the players are in on it.  I mean, I think they probably understand the "business" but they are trying.  So it's fun to watch them.  But I admit I'm not even close to emotionally invested as I was before the SB50.  It also just happens it's usually on a Sunday and I don't have much going on anyway.  I really think it's just one head ref that can push a game the way he wants it from instructions from the man upstairs.  Why else do they keep bad refs?   I don't think it always works out when they try to push the game though but more often than not it works.  Sometimes a team can beat the refs and the opposing team but it's rare.
×
×
  • Create New...