Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023 Defensive PFF Grades


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I'd say 4 players would do it. One player in each postional group. It's not like we are a void of talent. Just need some performing veterans in there.

In no order

1-2 corner

1 mlb

2 olb

1 edge

1 safety

 

Now I guess there is talk they can move chinn up for a hybridish lb role so then we would need more safety help.  And you can certainly argue that we need more dtackle help but IMO its not that imperative yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

In no order

1-2 corner

1 mlb

2 olb

1 edge

1 safety

 

Now I guess there is talk they can move chinn up for a hybridish lb role so then we would need more safety help.  And you can certainly argue that we need more dtackle help but IMO its not that imperative yet.

A couple of questions:

Why 2 corners?
Why 2 OLBs?
Is it 1 edge and still 2 OLBs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

A couple of questions:

Why 2 corners?
Why 2 OLBs?
Is it 1 edge and still 2 OLBs?

I dont trust DJ and henderson sucks and he might be cut.  Also there is the fact that Horn, freak injuries or not, hasnt played close to a full season yet

Shaq is probably gone after this year and we need another depth piece as well

1 edge to either play with burns or rotate in.  We just need more depth overall on the line

 

but like I said the new staff may change chinns position, he didnt have a great year

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I dont trust DJ and henderson sucks and he might be cut.  Also there is the fact that Horn, freak injuries or not, hasnt played close to a full season yet

Shaq is probably gone after this year and we need another depth piece as well

1 edge to either play with burns or rotate in.  We just need more depth overall on the line

 

but like I said the new staff may change chinns position, he didnt have a great year

I trust DJ coming back from the injury. I am concerned about CJ and Keith though. As for Shaq, I think he returns on a heavily discounted contract.  I agree with edge and I think we need a ball hawking safety. 

This is the way I see it:

Horn, CB2, DJ
ILB, Luvu, B. Smith, Shaq
Burns, Edge, YGM, Barno
Safety, Woods (maybe FA)

Chinn somewhere in there. So 4 total players and I do expect a mix of FAs plus draft prospects.  I wouldnt spend capital on another corner bc im afraid of a Horn injury. Too soon for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...