Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance?


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Who should we draft at 9?

Depends on who's there, and how you graded him. 

As for me, I think you have to go BPA, but with one caveat if you're in QB purgatory like we seem to be in: if it's close, I'd likely go with the QB, even if that's not my usual modus operandi. But, it would have to be close.

As for this draft specifically, outside of the top 3, I just can't see us drafting a QB at nine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Depends on who's there, and how you graded him. 

As for me, I think you have to go BPA, but with one caveat if you're in QB purgatory like we seem to be in: if it's close, I'd likely go with the QB, even if that's not my usual modus operandi. But, it would have to be close.

As for this draft specifically, outside of the top 3, I just can't see us drafting a QB at nine. 

I think we take AR or trade up for Stroud if he drops to around 3-5ish. That’s of course assuming Stroud declares.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I think we take AR or trade up for Stroud if he drops to around 3-5ish. That’s of course assuming Stroud declares.

I don't believe that we will draft Anthony Richardson at nine. His development will take way too much time to spend that type of draft compensation, and as such I just can't see any sensible GM drafting him in the top 10 (or top 20, really).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I don't believe that we will draft Anthony Richardson at nine. His development will take way too much time to spend that type of draft compensation, and as such I just can't see any sensible GM drafting him in the top 10 (or top 20, really).

If we hire Johnson I would bet anything we take ar at 9 if we don’t trade up.  The timeline matches perfect.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

If we hire Johnson I would bet anything we take ar at 9 if we don’t trade up.  The timeline matches perfect.  

We'll see. I think Johnson is as good as ours. I don't believe we'll spend that type of compensation on AR though. He's way too raw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If we hire Johnson I would bet anything we take ar at 9 if we don’t trade up.  The timeline matches perfect.  

Nate Sudfeld is Detroit’s backup and is a FA this offseason. I wouldn’t be surprised if we sign him for cheap abs draft one at 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Nate Sudfeld is Detroit’s backup and is a FA this offseason. I wouldn’t be surprised if we sign him for cheap abs draft one at 9.

If we're talking about backup / bridge QB types, would anybody be hugely surprised if Johnson decided to give Darnold a shot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Sudfeld knows his offense and would be much cheaper. It just depends on how confident Johnson is in him. Darnold was a Rhule reclamation project. Looking decent in Wilk’s power running offense doesn’t really prove much unless Johnson is wanting to run something similar. New coaches like to bring in some of their own guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we're talking about backup / bridge QB types, would anybody be hugely surprised if Johnson decided to give Darnold a shot?

I wouldn’t be surprised either way. Johnson has no ties to Sam and Sudfeld would know his offense/how he wants to run things more than any QB not named Goff. Plus he will be pretty cheap…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...