Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in Violation of League Rules


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

yes, tepper is a joke because of compliance training. 🤦‍♂️

y’all will whine about anything.

Yeah pretty sure interjecting your wife into the middle of a head coaching search that she’s grossly under qualified for, and failing to put her through the proper and league mandated compliance training, which is only in place due to the whole Brian Flores lawsuit that happened literally less than a year ago qualifies you as a joke.

maybe, just maybe you get away with it if you haven’t been an utter dumpster fire since you took over, but unfortunately that’s not the case for Dave.

 

Edited by NJPanthers12
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, travisura said:

This thread has become egregiously misogynist.

It has absolutely nothing to do with her being a female. Just most competent franchises turn to search committees or ex HOF Executives. But no, not dumpster Dave. He defers to Nicole, who has zero football background.

Edited by NJPanthers12
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

It’s has absolutely nothing to do with her being a female. Just most competent franchises turn to search committees or ex HOF Executives. But no, not dumpster Dave. He defers to Nicole, who has zero football background.

Anybody with an ounce of intellectual honesty can click back to page 3 of this thread and see the misogynistic behavior on full display. You might not have participated in it, but it's right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Icege said:

Anybody with an ounce of intellectual honesty can click back to page 3 of this thread and see the misogynistic behavior on full display. You might not have participated in it, but it's right there.

I was referring to my point of view and that it has nothing to do with her being female. Can’t speak for some of the other idiots in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

Yeah pretty sure interjecting your wife into the middle of a head coaching search that she’s grossly under qualified for, and failing to put her through the proper and league mandated compliance training, which is only in place due to the whole Brian Flores lawsuit that happened literally less than a year ago qualifies you as a joke.

maybe, just maybe you get away with it if you haven’t been an utter dumpster fire since you took over, but unfortunately that’s not the case for Dave.

 

i’m not personally aware of what her qualifications are. please share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

I was referring to my point of view and that it has nothing to do with her being female. Can’t speak for some of the other idiots in this thread.

Why respond if you're not the one being referenced? Seems a little silly. 😛

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mother Grabber said:

i’m not personally aware of what her qualifications are. please share.

While I don’t know if should waste my time explaining this to you because you are already on record of saying you will no longer be supporting this franchise if they hire Sean Payton, so you might not even be here in two weeks, but hey, I’m a nice guy. I’ll do it anyway for you.

total years of football personnel experience: 0

Seems pretty important you know in a search for a head coaching job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Why respond if you're not the one being referenced? Seems a little silly. 😛

It was a general statement in a thread I started where I voiced my displeasure of Nicole Tepper being involved. The poster didn’t quote a specific post or reference specific posters. I wanted to make it clear that my opinions are not coming for misogynistic point of view.

It seems pretty silly to me that you do not understand this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

While I don’t know if should waste my time explaining this to you because you are already on record of saying you will no longer be supporting this franchise if they hire Sean Payton, so you might not even be here in two weeks, but hey, I’m a nice guy. I’ll do it anyway for you.

total years of football personnel experience: 0

Seems pretty important you know in a search for a head coaching job.

that has nothing to do with what she is being dinged for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

that has nothing to do with what she is being dinged for.

That’s not what you asked. You asked me what her qualifications were.

She’s being dinged for not taking mandatory compliance training that was specifically put in due to the whole Brian Flores situation. I don’t understand the argument. If they are mandatory and she didn’t take them, then yes, the teopers are in the wrong.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...