Poll: What do you want Panthers to do for QB?

[mountainpantherfan2]

4 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Mahomes was a QB traded up for… Just saying..

Yes he was. But not a trade into the top 5.  What the Chiefs gave up for that pick was really not that much. They had the 27th pick that year. They traded that with a 3rd rounder and their 2018 first round pick to move up.

 

That’s reasonable. Compare that to what other teams have traded to move up into the top 5 for a QB. 

[WOW!!]

2 hours ago, mountainpantherfan2 said:

Yes he was. But not a trade into the top 5.  What the Chiefs gave up for that pick was really not that much. They had the 27th pick that year. They traded that with a 3rd rounder and their 2018 first round pick to move up.

 

That’s reasonable. Compare that to what other teams have traded to move up into the top 5 for a QB. 

Just saying that’s a lot of criteria to make a point.. When in reality depending on the situation trading up has worked for teams and is a necessity when you are convinced that player is a difference maker..

[mountainpantherfan2]

5 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Just saying that’s a lot of criteria to make a point.. When in reality depending on the situation trading up has worked for teams and is a necessity when you are convinced that player is a difference maker..

Completely agree.  My point was to say trading into the top 5 for a QB isn’t the sure fire way to win a Super Bowl the way some seem to feel it is. Plenty of teams have found success throughout the draft and through free agency and trades. 
 

 Another note to consider is the influences on Fitterer and Reich. Seattle was able to get to three Super Bowls and win one in the last 20 years with a 6th round and 3rd round QB.  Philadelphia won a Super Bowl with a 3rd round QB and just got to another Super Bowl with a 2nd round QB. 
 

Of course that doesn’t mean that is the only option. But I don’t think Fitterer and Reich will be locked in on only looking at QBs in the top 5 of the draft. 

[raleigh-panther]

From another site. The write up by an expert after the Mahomes pick by Chiefs 

[glenwo2]

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Why is nobody suggesting Aaron Rodgers?

 

Im like the only person who has discussed the idea. A 2 year run with Rodgers would be worth it. Would be like the Brady/Bucs run. We have enough pieces to win the NFC with Rodgers. Maybe get him a TE in FA and we are set.

Because Rodgers may wind up with the Jets.  

[mrcompletely11]

3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Because Rodgers may wind up with the Jets.  

And we can’t afford him and he is not a long term solution.  

[heel31ok]

20 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Just saying that’s a lot of criteria to make a point.. When in reality depending on the situation trading up has worked for teams and is a necessity when you are convinced that player is a difference maker..

Just not convinced there is one in this draft.

[WOW!!]

18 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Just not convinced there is one in this draft.

That’s okay.. I do..

sooo

agree to disagree 

[drectors cut]

I hate the idea of trading up to 3 with the possibility that both Stroud and Young go 1 and 2 unless the coaching staff really likes 3 QBs in the draft. I'd trade up to 1 and get the guy they really want. Imagine how much easier this would have been if we would have just tanked the whole season.

[Green-Ghost]

My thought is to trade up for the #1 draft choice, assuming the Bears are gullible.  ( I do not recommend a Mike Ditka style, trade away the future.  ). Leave that for the Saints.

my 2nd choice is to bring in Carr if available.  (There are several teams trying to bring in Carr.)

3rd Choice is to go with the draft,  

Jackson has too much baggage.

Jamis Winston would be ok,, only if he came with tranquilizers to keep him from panicking and throwing to the other team.