Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go for Carr hard and save #9 pick?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

“Swing when you get the chance”

Browns 1st round QBs:

Baker Mayfield, Brandon Weeden, Brady Quinn, Tim Couch, Johnny Manzel

Jets 1st round QBs:

Pennington, Sanchez, Darnold and Wilson


Yeah let me get some of that!

You're so scared you don't even realize what you're arguing for now. You're way beyond "next year". Now by your logic no team should ever draft QB in the first round again because they could *gasp* miss. I'll be here giddy as a MFer if and when we draft a QB and ya'll can sit and be mad if you want 🫡

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Do you even understand how off seasons work? Do you realize the volume of NFL teams that have QBs under contract and the turnover of such?

if I pointed out 16 teams you would be like “well that’s only half the league show me the other half”.

You’re thought process is like late 2000s Al Davis with dementia. 
 

So Mahomes one the SB this year, before that was Stafford a FA, Brady a FA (who was also a 6th round pick). 

And again I’m waiting on your philosophy to be explained.. Since I’m Al Davis what are you?? The hope and wish guy ??  I know you might be absent but we’ve done the FA retread thing 3 years in a row.. We went after Stanford, Wilson, and Watson.. We have done the Diamond in the ruff thing with Allen.. What is your plan exactly since I’ve stated mine ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

No I didn’t I’m playing the with the same Goal post you are.. You’re the one trying to change the game..

Top 10 QB picks on original draft team was the metric I was using.  Somehow 3rd-7th in a draft year came up.  Obviously the percentages goes down, but what position doesn't? I found a year-2014 that had three guys start successfully for their teams later in the draft.  Was it 3rd-7th? No, but who cares--dumb and arbitrary parameters you set forth to somehow make your point.  Higher draft picks tend to do better, you don't say?

Anyway, I do the digging and you ask rhetorical questions.  Do your own research, for one, and two, you will see the folly of moving up at all costs for QBs.  Strategically moving up is fine, but not at all cost because of irrationally impatient fans.  I've stated today that I'd be willing to go up to #5 if one of the two is still there.  Moving to #3 or #1 is--I'll plainly say it--STUPID.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

And again I’m waiting on your philosophy to be explained.. Since I’m Al Davis what are you?? The hope and wish guy ??  I know you might be absent but we’ve done the FA retread thing 3 years in a row.. We went after Stanford, Wilson, and Watson.. We have done the Diamond in the ruff thing with Allen.. What is your plan exactly since I’ve stated mine ??

In this situation you go after Carr. He has had a very similar career to Stafford. Our coaching staff is so high powered it will be picked apart the next 2 years by teams poaching for their staffs. So you have to take your shot while the OL and defense is solid. Take BPA in the draft and take your shot like the Rams/Bucs did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Top 10 QB picks on original draft team was the metric I was using.  Somehow 3rd-7th in a draft year came up.  Obviously the percentages goes down, but what position doesn't? I found a year-2014 that had three guys start successfully for their teams later in the draft.  Was it 3rd-7th? No, but who cares--dumb and arbitrary parameters you set forth to somehow make your point.  Higher draft picks tend to do better, you don't say?

Anyway, I do the digging and you ask rhetorical questions.  Do your own research, for one, and two, you will see the folly of moving up at all costs for QBs.  Strategically moving up is fine, but not at all cost because of irrationally impatient fans.  I've stated today that I'd be willing to go up to #5 if one of the two is still there.  Moving to #3 or #1 is--I'll plainly say it--STUPID.

I’ve already done the research and “You’re the one who brought the 1/4 QB stat not me”.. The research already has spoken that the hit rate on getting a Qb in the 1st round especially too 10 is better then getting a QB any other way..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cdparr7 said:

In this situation you go after Carr. He has had a very similar career to Stafford. Our coaching staff is so high powered it will be picked apart the next 2 years by teams poaching for their staffs. So you have to take your shot while the OL and defense is solid. Take BPA in the draft and take your shot like the Rams/Bucs did. 

Okay then you’re Matt Rhule.. Cool.. Sorry agree to disagree..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Or Bruce Arians or Sean McVay. 

Cool 1 is a won year wonder with the goat and the other is thinking about retiring at age 37.. 

Reality check .. We aren’t the Rams nor The Bucs and Carr isn’t Close to Brady,”..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I’ve already done the research and “You’re the one who brought the 1/4 QB stat not me”.. The research already has spoken that the hit rate on getting a Qb in the 1st round especially too 10 is better then getting a QB any other way..

image.thumb.png.d7dd0775f7a1791020b6eaa5d31bc68a.png

Good thing we don't want a first round RB!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people get too caught up with Super Bowl wins. It takes a talented team, coach, QB, and some luck to win one. The best chance at winning one is the build a constant contender. A team always in the playoff race. You need a good coach and a franchise QB to do this. We need to build a consistent playoff team then worry about a final piece to make a Super Bowl push. Bengals Burrow, Chiefs Mahomes, and Allen Bills are going to be constant AFC threats. All have talented QBs (2 were traded up to draft), with smart coaches that have built solid teams around these young QBs. That’s the blueprint we should follow IMO.

There is also a clear shortage on franchise QBs in the league. This means QBs that could have been 2nd round picks in the past will likely get drafted higher (in the 1st). It’s the most valuable position in sports. If our now very experienced staff falls in love with one then Fitt should have no problem making a trade up happen to acquire that QB.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

What’s the bust rate on QBs in the 2nd, 3rd and so on and so on.……..

 

 

 

 

Dont worry I already know and so do you..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Or Bruce Arians or Sean McVay. 

The Brady thing happening is extremely rare if not once in a generation. The GOAT QB becomes a FA and decides where he wants to play while still playing at an elite level. I’m not interested in trying to replicate that.

McVay built his team on trading picks for vets and paying for big time free agents. It’s a solid strategy but very short term. It’s one of the reasons he is flirting with going into broadcasting. He knows his cap is about to be screwed while his team ages out. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I think people get too caught up with Super Bowl wins. It takes a talented team, coach, QB, and some luck to win one. The best chance at winning one is the build a constant contender. A team always in the playoff race. You need a good coach and a franchise QB to do this. We need to build a consistent playoff team then worry about a final piece to make a Super Bowl push. Bengals Burrow, Chiefs Mahomes, and Allen Bills are going to be constant AFC threats. All have talented QBs (2 were traded up to draft), with smart coaches that have built solid teams around these young QBs. That’s the blueprint we should follow IMO.

There is also a clear shortage on franchise QBs in the league. This means QBs that could have been 2nd round picks in the past will likely get drafted higher (in the 1st). It’s the most valuable position in sports. If our now very experienced staff falls in love with one then Fitt should have no problem making a trade up happen to acquire that QB.

Ppl neglect to see That.. The teams that get it right and draft and develop their QB are usually always have a chance.. The teams that play this QB musical chairs are constantly disjointed and hoping for luck..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The Brady thing happening is extremely rare if not once in a generation. The GOAT QB becomes a FA and decides where he wants to play while still playing at an elite level. I’m not interested in trying to replicate that.

McVay built his team on trading picks for vets and paying for big time free agents. It’s a solid strategy but very short term. It’s one of the reasons he is flirting with going into broadcasting. He knows his cap is about to be screwed while his team ages out. 

Thank you god… For somebody recognizing how rare the Bucs and Rams situations are..

ppl in here want to play the bust rate on 1st round QBs but don’t want to do the math on how rare it is for The Bucs and Rams situation was in being successful..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...