Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson draft stock


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

AR is built like Derek Henry.  He is a unicorn QB if he can be developed correctly. Wouldn't shock me if he ends up going #1 overall based on his physical traits.

Well, it would shock me. It takes way more than physical traits to be an NFL QB, and actually developing a QB takes time. Things like pocket presence and accuracy may not be able to be developed depending upon the guy, and you probably won't find that out until a few years down the road.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Who do you want as a QB?

Player A - Amazing throwing motion. Amazing footwork. Good arm. Amazing accuracy.

Player B - Jumps super high and far. Super fast. Strong. Built like a cyborg.

Depends, has Player A ever won a big game and does he wilt under pressure?

Oh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

The problem with America is that too many idiots want AR-15s. 

Don’t start going down this road. I’m not going to let fun pre-draft threads about exciting prospects get derailed because of snappy political one-liners. Not gonna do it. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Who do you want as a QB?

Player A - Amazing throwing motion. Amazing footwork. Good arm. Amazing accuracy.

Player B - Jumps super high and far. Super fast. Strong. Built like a cyborg.

I kind of want the cyborg when you put it like that. I look forward to having AR get us to the Super Bowl and then because of his size the NFL lets him take a physical ass whooping on live TV and we get screwed again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want him. And he's the only player I'd be fine trading up for to get if we had to. I'd take Richardson or Stroud ahead of Levis and Young. Richardson for his upside and Stroud because he seems to have the ability to come close to matching what Mahomes can do throwing the ball.

Also, if you draft Richardson and he can't make QB work, you will have an elite tight end where all you have to develop is his blocking ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Montsta said:

I kind of want the cyborg when you put it like that. I look forward to having AR get us to the Super Bowl and then because of his size the NFL lets him take a physical ass whooping on live TV and we get screwed again.

That game was rigged for Payton. We all knew it as soon as they called that Cotchery ball incomplete.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...