Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which of these FA WRs would you want to go after?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

Okay!! 
Now a few Questions..

Do you have to do that year 1 of a 5 year experience???

If you can’t is that the end all to be all??

Have you seen the FA list right now and the draft???

Are Any of them going to be a number 1 great WR day 1???

So again is this going to be the end of this experience if you can’t get your great WR year 1??

Do you trust the staff you assembled to be able to navigate until you get the Number 1 great WR???

Okay!! lol

1) Yes, you do. Cam Newton had Steve Smith, Greg Olsen and Jeremy Shockey. This team has plumbers and truck drivers at WR and TE.

2) Oh not at all, unless you want to win games.

3) Yes. The wide receiver FA list right now is absolute asswater.

4) The most likely instant-impact WR will go in the top 12, if not earlier.

5) No, the end of the experience is when the next QB is drafted, the GM and coaches get fired, or the team starts winning and doesn't need to do those.

6) No. Take your greatest HC ever, whoever you perceive him to be, and strip him of all offensive talent. He won't win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Right, but now you have to hope and pray you get a QB as good as Moore is a WR, and now, you don't even have Darnold-tier WRs to catch his passes.

You have to eventually try for a QB. We could have 3 DJ Moores and it wouldn’t matter until we have a QB. IF our QB looks the part we will probably make a big splash for a great WR next year when we have more cap. Similar to the Bills and Diggs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

You have to eventually try for a QB. We could have 3 DJ Moores and it wouldn’t matter until we have a QB. IF our QB looks the part we will probably make a big splash for a great WR next year when we have more cap. Similar to the Bills and Diggs. 

I'm all in favor of trying for a QB. I don't trust this team to be smart enough to draft Stroud.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The division is weak and there for the taking, and with no 1st rounder next season it doesn’t really make sense to throttle down.

 

still, there’s lot of things that need to be answered.

We’ve felt for a while like the roster was close and needed a QB, and that still mostly remains true, but we’ve presented a few problems for ourselves.

Trading Moore was necessary, but getting Corbett and Christiansen hurt in a meaningless game wasn’t. Switch to an odd alignment up front presents some roster challenges as well that will probably take two offseasons to be answered.

the bigger problem is players we were counting on developing not doing so: Gross-Matos and Henderson are high draft picks playing two very valuable positions. Neither can be counted on. 

the Panthers have a strong defensive core but it needs improvements, and so there’s the question of which side of the ball are you going to tackle this offseason and which are you going to tackle next offseason.

the smart move is to play to the talent, but you really do have to find a way to put some quality weapons around your rookie QB ASAP.

i think most can agree we need a veteran TE-I know some want a rookie but it’s just not the right moment for that. You need a proven commodity. 

there are guys who can stretch the field at WR in this free agent pool, I’d go for one of those as well.

you then need to plug a couple gaps on defense with legitimate players who fit your scheme 

i think they need to sign four legitimate players in free agency

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2023 at 5:56 AM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Don't spend money on this class. 

 

Wait until next year Tee Higgins will be available no way the Bengals can afford to keep him with Burrow and Chase waiting in the cut for big paydays.

I mean you literally have to spend money on this class - we don't have any receivers in the building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We’ve had Moore for years with nothing to show. Even the best WRs need a QB to get them the ball regularly. 

Moore has 3 1k yard seasons with 'bad' QBs throwing the ball to him.

It's baffling we've traded him away when we're about to get a 'good' QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Moore has 3 1k yard seasons with 'bad' QBs throwing the ball to him.

It's baffling we've traded him away when we're about to get a 'good' QB.

yeah and that led us to multiple top 10 picks...  He needs TDs to win and he needs a good QB to throw TDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We have money to spend next year.

 

I rather trade for an actual #1 WR aka Hopkins 

 

We can sign WR's just don't spend big money there is no game changing WR on the FA market this year.

No more trading away picks, please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...