Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Ricardson Board Work with Steve Mariucci


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, so seeing as how our finalists for the QB position have been narrowed down to Stroud or Richardson, I stumbled across this video that I don't think many huddlers have seen. 

So from 0:00 to 5:35 is pretty much the interview. After that it's a repeat. I liked the way he diagrammed the play, and just was overall fun to learn about him. One thing that was interesting to me though was that he said he had little to no familiarity with the West Coast Offense. Not sure if that's what we're running or not but I think definitely something of note. 

 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Richardson but he lacks basic QB fundamentals.  Hes a project qb that will take awhile to develop.  He has all the physical ability, he is coachable but he hasnt played that much football especially in college.  He needs time that I doubt management and the fan base are willing to give him.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chknwing said:

I like Richardson but he lacks basic QB fundamentals.  Hes a project qb that will take awhile to develop.  He has all the physical ability, he is coachable but he hasnt played that much football especially in college.  He needs time that I doubt management and the fan base are willing to give him.

"That's what this staff is for."

I like Richardson enough that if the staff likes him enough to take him #1 overall, I won't be chafed. Means they have a plan.

However if it comes out that it was an owners pick or something, wellllllllllll...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I do not know. Richardson and Heaner was the only 2 that they have shown so far. 

I've always wondered if these were chopped up just for the fans. They wouldnt show a failed QB, or maybe they do but chop it up to look like they nailed it. Obviously players' agents wouldnt allow it to be shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

I've always wondered if these were chopped up just for the fans. They wouldnt show a failed QB, or maybe they do but chop it up to look like they nailed it. Obviously players' agents wouldnt allow it to be shown.

I'm sure it's edited for time but what content is kept or cut is never discussed.  I doubt Mooch has a vest interest in making these guys look better than they really are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I've always wondered if these were chopped up just for the fans. They wouldnt show a failed QB, or maybe they do but chop it up to look like they nailed it. Obviously players' agents wouldnt allow it to be shown.

Depends on the integrity of who's producing it honestly.  I'd be willing to a bet a QB who fails one of these would gather more views than someone who succeeds, but showing it does nothing but satiate the fans because scouts/gms already know what they need to know.

Edited by Rags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm sure it's edited for time but what content is kept or cut is never discussed.  I doubt Mooch has a vest interest in making these guys look better than they really are. 

if he gets paid to do it.... Im sure he has plenty of interest. AR aside, these guys get paid for amplify their opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
    • If there’s any year to be aggressive with it, it’s this one.
×
×
  • Create New...